Climate Change Coverage in The Guardian, 2010–2025
ガーディアン紙における気候変動報道、2010～2025年 (AI 翻訳)
Fabian Dablander, Simon Wimmer, Jonas M B Haslbeck
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、大規模言語モデルを用いてガーディアン紙の気候変動関連記事18,785本を分析。2018年以降、報道量が大幅に増加したが、化石燃料や再生可能エネルギーに偏り、農業や過剰消費、炭素不平等といったテーマは軽視されている。適応策の報道も不十分であり、より包括的な報道の必要性を示す。
English
This study uses a validated LLM-based methodology to analyze 18,785 Guardian articles on climate change from 2010 to 2025. Coverage surged after 2018 but disproportionately focuses on fossil fuels and renewables, neglecting agriculture, overconsumption, and carbon inequality. Adaptation receives far less attention, highlighting opportunities for more comprehensive reporting.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文は、英国のメディアを対象としているが、日本におけるGX関連報道の偏りを点検する枠組みを提供する。日本の政策や企業開示と連動した報道の分析にも応用可能である。
In the global GX context
This paper presents a replicable LLM-based framework for analyzing climate journalism, relevant to understanding media influence on global climate action. It reveals coverage gaps that could undermine public support for comprehensive mitigation and adaptation policies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers can adopt this LLM-based methodology to analyze climate coverage in other outlets or regions.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should note the gaps in media coverage of adaptation and systemic issues like overconsumption, which affects public support for climate policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Leading news outlets play a central role in shaping how political leaders and the public understand the causes, impacts, and solutions to climate change. Here, we provide the first comprehensive assessment of how The Guardian, a globally influential newspaper widely recognized for high-quality climate journalism, has reported on climate change between 2010 and 2025. We applied a validated methodology based on large language models to analyze N = 18,785 articles and evaluate to what extent reporting covers scientifically grounded causes, impacts, mitigation strategies, and adaptation measures. We find that climate coverage increased markedly after 2018 and has remained structurally elevated relative to the preceding decade. Coverage of causes and mitigation is dominated by fossil fuels and renewable energy, whereas agriculture, overconsumption, carbon inequality, and economic growth are mentioned far less frequently. Aspects related to adaptation receive considerably less attention than aspects related to causes, impacts, and mitigation. Our findings highlight opportunities for more comprehensive coverage that better reflects full range of societal transformations needed to address climate change.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/hy6re_v1first seen 2026-05-05 19:13:46
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。