自然基盤ソリューションによる土壌保護の推進：環境・社会・資金要因の統合的評価
Advancing soil protection through nature-based solutions: an integrated evaluation of environmental, societal, and funding factors (原題)
Daniel Ruiz-Beamonte, Marianna Garfí
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
土壌劣化に対処する自然基盤ソリューション（NbS）の最新動向を、環境・社会・経済の多次元で整理したレビュー。アグロフォレストリーやバイオ炭等は炭素隔離・生物多様性・水規制に寄与するが、資金制約・政策の不整合・長期エビデンス不足が普及の障壁となる。土壌類型や適用セクターの報告不足が再現性・拡張性を制限すると指摘し、学際連携や官民連携資金、政策枠組みへの統合を提言する。
English
A review synthesizing the state of the art on soil nature-based solutions (NbS) across environmental, social and economic dimensions. Agroforestry, reforestation, biochar and bioremediation support carbon sequestration, biodiversity and water regulation, yet adoption is constrained by funding limits, policy misalignment and thin long-term evidence. Poor reporting of soil types and application sectors hampers replicability, so the authors call for interdisciplinary collaboration, public-private funding and policy integration.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では生物多様性国家戦略やTNFD対応、有報での自然資本開示が進む。土壌NbSの資金スキームや官民連携の議論は、国内企業が自然関連リスク・機会を統合報告書で説明する際の論点整理に資する。
In the global GX context
Aligns with the global shift toward nature-related disclosure under TNFD and ISSB's biodiversity work, and with CSRD's soil and ecosystem requirements. Its emphasis on funding schemes and policy alignment speaks to transition-finance debates on how to bank nature-based projects with measurable outcomes.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:土壌NbSの多次元評価フレームと研究ギャップ（長期エビデンス・報告標準）を整理する出発点として有用。
🏢実務担当者:自然資本・生物多様性の取り組みを資金調達や官民連携と結びつける際の論点整理に使える。
🏛政策担当者:土壌保護政策とNbS普及のため、資金スキーム設計と政策整合、報告標準の整備が鍵となる点を確認できる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Soil degradation presents significant global challenges, threatening food security, biodiversity and ecosystem services, while intensifying the impacts of climate change. Soil NbS offer viable alternatives to conventional engineered solutions by integrating biodiversity conservation with sustainable land management practices such as agroforestry, reforestation, biochar application and bioremediation. Technically, soil NbS contribute to erosion control, soil restoration, and pollutant remediation; environmentally, they support carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, water regulation, and ecosystem resilience; socially, they promote stakeholder engagement and sustainable land management; and economically, they can reduce dependence on conventional engineered solutions while creating new financing opportunities. This review analysed the current state of the art on soil NbS, highlighting these multidimensional benefits and identifying challenges and opportunities, such as funding schemes, interdisciplinary collaboration, policy alignment, long-term evidence and research gaps. From a technical perspective, the study highlighted that soil NbS were mainly applied for soil protection, with emphasis on addressing land degradation across global and regional contexts. However, inadequate reporting of soil types and application sectors may limit replicability and scalability, highlighting the need for context-specific documentation. Moreover, the findings reinforced that soil NbS success depends not only on technical performance but also on institutional support, inclusive governance, and integrated planning. Despite their benefits, soil NbS adoption is constrained by funding limitations, policy misalignment, lack of long-term evidence and stakeholder engagement. To overcome these barriers, the review emphasises interdisciplinary collaboration, sustainable funding (e.g., public-private partnerships) and integration into policy frameworks. Public awareness campaigns and training programs are essential for increasing stakeholder acceptance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2026.100741first seen 2026-10-19 05:00:47
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。