← 論文一覧に戻る

Theoretical Framework for Greening Air Logistics A Perspective Based on Low-Carbon Technology and Supply Chain Collaboration

航空物流のグリーン化のための理論的枠組み:低炭素技術とサプライチェーン協調の視点から (AI 翻訳)

X. L. Liu

Advanced Electromagnetics📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-13#エネルギー転換経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: transport
DOI: 10.7716/aem.v15i3.3923
原典: https://doi.org/10.7716/aem.v15i3.3923

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

航空物流のグリーン変革には、低炭素技術の導入とサプライチェーン協調の統合的最適化が不可欠である。本研究は、技術駆動層・協調運用層・価値目標層からなる三次元の理論・分析枠組みを構築し、持続可能な航空燃料、新エネルギー地上設備、炭素フットプリント監視、情報共有、プロセス統合、資源協調を相互作用するシステム要素としてモデル化した。多因子分散分析、システムダイナミクス、多事例比較を用いて、高技術・高協調構成は低技術・低協調構成と比較して炭素排出強度を43.4%削減し、運用効率を41.9%向上させることを示した。

English

Green transformation of air logistics requires coordinated optimization of low-carbon technology deployment and supply-chain collaboration. This study develops a three-dimensional framework (technology-driven, collaborative operation, value objective) modeling sustainable aviation fuel, new-energy ground equipment, carbon monitoring, information sharing, process integration, and resource collaboration. Using multi-factor variance analysis, system dynamics, and multi-case comparison, it finds that high-technology and high-collaboration configurations reduce carbon emission intensity by 43.4% and improve operational efficiency by 41.9% compared to low-technology and low-collaboration configurations.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の航空物流業界は、国際的な脱炭素圧力(CORSIA等)と国内の2050年カーボンニュートラル目標への対応が急務である。本論文の枠組みは、SAF導入や地上設備の電化、炭素モニタリングとサプライチェーン協調を統合する点で、日本の物流企業や空港運営者が実践的なロードマップを描く上で参考になる。

In the global GX context

Globally, air logistics faces increasing pressure to decarbonize under CORSIA and net-zero commitments. This paper provides a systematic framework integrating low-carbon technologies and supply-chain collaboration, offering a model for other regions to assess the trade-offs between technology investment and operational coordination. The quantified emission reductions (43.4%) provide a benchmark for policy and industry targets.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a theoretical framework and empirical evidence on the interaction between low-carbon technology and supply-chain collaboration in air logistics, useful for further research on sustainable transport systems.

🏢実務担当者:Offers decision support for implementing low-carbon technologies and collaborative practices in air logistics, potentially reducing emissions and improving efficiency.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of integrated approaches combining technology and collaboration for decarbonizing air logistics, informing policy design for sustainable aviation.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Green transformation of air logistics requires coordinated optimization of low-carbon technology deployment and supply-chain collaboration, especially under high-frequency and time-sensitive freight scenarios. This study develops a three-dimensional theoretical and analytical framework consisting of a technology-driven layer, collaborative operation layer, and value objective layer. Sustainable aviation fuel, new-energy ground equipment, carbon-footprint monitoring, information sharing, process integration, and resource collaboration are modeled as interacting system components. Multi-factor variance analysis, system-dynamics simulation, and multi-case comparison are used to test the interaction effect between low-carbon technology and collaboration. Results show that the high-technology and high-collaboration configuration reduces carbon-emission intensity by 43.4% and improves operational efficiency by 41.9% compared with the low-technology and low-collaboration configuration. The proposed framework reveals the dynamic coupling between technology embedding and collaborative operations and provides decision support for low-carbon air logistics, IoT-based carbon monitoring, and sustainable transport-system optimization.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。