← 論文一覧に戻る

倉庫自動化機器の炭素排出量:LCAアプローチによる系統的文献レビュー

Warehouse carbon emission of automation equipment’ using LCA approach: a systematic literature review (原題)

Nikhilesh Dwivedi, Amandeep Singh Oberoi, Deepu Philip

Journal of Responsible Production and Consumption📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-11-02#炭素会計経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: transport
DOI: 10.1108/jrpc-01-2026-0002
原典: https://www.emerald.com/jrpc/article-pdf/3/1/167/11941719/jrpc-01-2026-0002en.pdf
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

倉庫自動化機器(AGV・ロボットアーム・AS/RS)のライフサイクル炭素排出に関する64本の文献を系統的にレビューした研究。グリーン倉庫・自動化研究は成熟する一方、自動化×LCAの交差領域には技術ライフサイクルの短縮化と地域電力炭素強度依存という二つの未解明ギャップがあると指摘する。製造段階のLCAと倉庫レベルの炭素会計を統合する4分類の枠組みを初めて提示した。

English

A PRISMA-aligned systematic review of 64 papers (2001–2026) on carbon emissions from warehouse automation equipment (AGVs, robotic arms, AS/RS). It finds green warehousing and automation literatures mature but the automation×LCA intersection underdeveloped, flagging two gaps: technology life-cycle truncation inflating amortised embodied carbon, and inconsistent treatment of regional grid carbon intensity in Scope 2/3 electricity sourcing. It offers the first four-cohort thematic matrix linking manufacturing LCA with warehouse-level carbon accounting.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

SSBJ基準や有報でのScope 3算定が進む日本では、物流施設の自動化投資に伴うembodied carbonと電力由来排出の扱いが実務課題となる。物流大手の設備更新サイクルと地域電力炭素強度を踏まえた算定枠組みとして、国内の物流GX・省エネ投資判断に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

As ISSB/CSRD and Scope 3 disclosure tighten, warehouse automation capex increasingly carries embodied and electricity-sourcing emissions that firms must account for. This review links manufacturing-oriented LCA with warehouse-level carbon accounting, supporting green warehouse standards and more defensible Scope 2/3 boundary decisions globally.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:倉庫自動化を独立したLCAコホートとして扱う動的モデル研究の出発点となる。

🏢実務担当者:自動化設備投資のライフサイクル環境コストとScope 2/3算定範囲の見直しに活用できる。

🏛政策担当者:設備ライフサイクルと地域電力炭素強度を考慮したグリーン倉庫基準の設計に示唆を与える。

📄 Abstract(原文)

The rapid commercialisation of automated warehousing spanning automated guided vehicles (AGVs), robotic arms and automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS) has significantly elevated energy consumption and carbon emissions across global supply chains. Despite growing policy attention and the adoption of standards such as ISO 14001, warehouse-level carbon accounting for automation equipment across its full life cycle remains fragmented and underdeveloped. This paper aims to systematically review existing literature on carbon emissions generated by automation equipment used in warehouse management system (WMS) processes, and to examine methodologies available for measuring CO2 emissions in both manufacturing and warehousing contexts, with a specific focus on the cradle-to-grave environmental accountability of automation technologies. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-aligned guidelines, covering 64 peer-reviewed papers published between 2001 and early 2026, sourced from Scopus, Google Scholar and Web of Science. Search terms were refined through expert consultation and industry discussions. An initial pool of 130 papers was screened against defined inclusion criteria relevance to warehousing sustainability, English-language peer-reviewed publication and exclusion of WMS software-only or algorithmic studies, yielding a final corpus of 64 papers. The selected literature was organised into four thematic cohorts: production value chain, green warehousing, warehouse automation and life cycle assessment (LCA). Bibliometric trends and keyword co-occurrence networks were analysed to map the current research landscape. While green warehousing and automation literature is relatively mature, this review identifies two critical underexplored gaps at the intersection of warehouse automation and LCA. Technology life cycle truncation where rapid equipment innovation cycles for AGVs and robotic systems challenge conventional LCA lifetime assumptions, elevating amortised embodied carbon per unit of service delivered; and energy-mix-dependent greenhouse gas footprints where regional grid carbon intensity and Scope 2/Scope 3 electricity sourcing remain inconsistently addressed in warehouse-level environmental assessments. This is the first systematic review to treat warehouse automation equipment as a distinct LCA cohort, linking manufacturing-oriented LCA frameworks with warehouse-level carbon accounting within a unified four-cohort thematic matrix. The findings offer actionable guidance for researchers developing dynamic warehouse-specific LCA models, for practitioners internalising full life cycle environmental costs of automation investments and for policymakers designing green warehouse standards that account for equipment life cycle and regional energy-mix sensitivity.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。