Sustainable Resilience in Critical Mineral Supply Chains: An ESG and Circular Economy Perspective
持続可能なレジリエンスを備えた重要鉱物サプライチェーン：ESGとサーキュラーエコノミーの視点から (AI 翻訳)
Hasan Tutar, C. Erden
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は2015～2025年の106本の論文を系統的にレビューし、重要鉱物サプライチェーンにおけるESG要因と循環経済の役割を分析。環境・社会・ガバナンスの成果とリサイクル慣行がサプライチェーンの強靭性に与える影響を統合的に検討し、CMISFフレームワークを提案する。
English
This systematic review of 106 studies (2015-2025) analyzes how ESG factors and circular economy practices shape resilience in critical mineral supply chains. It proposes the Critical Minerals Integrated Sustainability Framework (CMISF) linking ESG capabilities and recycling to supply chain resilience, highlighting barriers and policy misalignments.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はEV・電子機器向け重要鉱物の大部分を輸入に依存しており、サプライチェーンの強靭性とESG基準の調和は喫緊の課題。本フレームワークは、日本の企業がリサイクル投資やガバナンス強化を進める際の理論的基盤を提供する。
In the global GX context
Critical minerals are vital for global low-carbon transitions. This framework integrates ESG and circular economy, offering a structured approach for supply chain resilience that aligns with emerging disclosure standards (e.g., ISSB, CSRD) and investor demands for transparency on material risks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a synthesized framework (CMISF) that bridges institutional theory and resource-based view, offering a new lens for studying ESG-circular economy linkages in mineral supply chains.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the strategic importance of recycling investments and collaborative governance to reduce supply risks and improve ESG performance in critical mineral sourcing.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the need for harmonized ESG standards and policies that incentivize recycling infrastructure and multi-stakeholder governance to secure long-term mineral supply.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Supply chains for critical minerals such as lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements are now at the heart of low‐carbon transitions and geopolitical competition. This study conducts a systematic review that blends quantitative synthesis with the contextual richness of qualitative thematic analysis to clarify how these chains are shaped by environmental, social and governance (ESG) dynamics. Drawing on 106 peer‐reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025, this study examines the links between ESG performance, recycling practices, and supply chain resilience through a single integrative lens. Descriptive statistics and a correlation matrix summarize the direction and strength of reported relationships. At the same time, thematic analysis uncovers technical, economic, and institutional barriers, policy misalignments, and regional asymmetries in the sustainable supply of critical minerals. Building on these insights, the paper proposes the Critical Minerals Integrated Sustainability Framework (CMISF), which connects institutional theory with the resource‐based view to explain how ESG capabilities and recycling capacity support resilience. The study highlights the importance of harmonized ESG standards, patient investments in recycling infrastructure, and genuinely collaborative governance among firms, regulators, and communities to sustain critical mineral systems over the long term, with explicit implications for corporate strategy, risk management, and long‐term competitive positioning in critical mineral industries.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70850first seen 2026-05-15 18:54:53
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。