自然を基盤とした解決策としてのコミュニティ管理システム:インド・ケーララ州の聖林における標高と面積が花き多様性と炭素蓄積に及ぼす影響
Community‐Managed Systems as Nature‐Based Solutions: Effects of Elevation and Size on Floral Richness and Carbon Stock of Sacred Groves in Kerala, India (原題)
Kavya Jeevan, R. Ashwin, Kannankodantavida Manjusha, C. R. Magesh, S. Anbazhagi, Muthukumar Muthuchamy
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
インド・ケーララ州の聖林55カ所を対象に、標高と面積が植物種多様性・炭素蓄積・土壌特性に与える影響を分析した研究。総炭素蓄積は30〜318 Mg ha−1(平均113)と大きく変動したが、標高や面積との有意な関係は見られなかった。一方、種多様性は標高と面積の双方で有意に変化し、土壌窒素が最も強い予測因子であった。聖林は面積や標高によらず安定した炭素貯留機能を持ち、自然を基盤とした解決策として有効だと結論づけている。
English
This study examines 55 sacred groves in Kerala, India, testing how elevation and grove size affect plant species richness, carbon stock and soil properties. Total carbon stock ranged 30–318 Mg ha−1 (mean 113) with no significant relation to elevation or size, while species richness varied significantly with both. Soil nitrogen was the strongest predictor of richness. The authors argue sacred groves function as reliable nature-based solutions combining biodiversity conservation and climate mitigation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では里山・鎮守の森など地域管理の森林が生物多様性保全と炭素貯留を両立する事例として知られ、TNFDや生物多様性クレジット、地域脱炭素の議論に示唆を与える。ただし炭素市場や開示制度との接続は直接的でない。
In the global GX context
Adds empirical evidence to the nature-based solutions and biodiversity-carbon co-benefit literature relevant to TNFD and CSRD biodiversity disclosures, though it does not connect to carbon markets or corporate disclosure frameworks directly.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:地域管理森林における炭素と生物多様性の関係を定量化した実証例として参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:TNFDや生物多様性保全の文脈で、地域コミュニティ管理地の炭素・生態系価値を評価する際の参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:地域参加型の保全政策と自然を基盤とした解決策の設計において、面積と標高に応じた管理の重要性を示す。
📄 Abstract(原文)
ABSTRACT Limiting global warming to 1.5°C–2°C requires rapid reductions in atmospheric carbon, highlighting the need to conserve ecosystems with high carbon stock potential. Sacred groves are culturally protected forest fragments maintained through traditional practices and represent community‐managed landscapes with significant potential as nature‐based solutions. This study evaluated the influence of elevation and grove size on plant species richness, carbon stock and soil properties in 55 sacred groves (31 lowland, 19 midland and 5 highland; ranging from 0.025 to 20.2 ha and from 3 to 906 m above mean sea level) across different physiographic regions of Kerala, India. Aboveground biomass carbon was estimated using allometric equations, and soil organic carbon was quantified by wet digestion; these components were combined to estimate total carbon stock. Species richness, carbon stock and soil properties were analysed across elevation and grove‐size categories using one‐way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis tests and multiple linear regression. Total carbon stock ranged from 30.46 to 318 Mg ha −1 (mean 113 Mg ha −1 ) but showed no significant relationship with elevation or grove size. In contrast, plant species richness (5–177 species) varied significantly across both factors (elevation: p = 0.005, grove size: p < 0.001). Sacred groves in the midland region supported the highest mean species richness (70 species) among elevation classes, compared with 56 in highland and 37 in lowland groves, while larger groves harboured more species (71) than medium (67) and small (30) groves. Multiple regression identified soil nitrogen as the strongest predictor of species richness (adjusted R 2 = 0.19), with grove area showing a consistent positive but marginal effect, whereas total carbon stock was best explained by exchangeable potassium (adjusted R 2 = 0.13). Soil properties, particularly exchangeable potassium (highest in midland groves, 0.004%) and bulk density (highest in highland groves, 1.76 g cm −3 ), exhibited distinct physiographic patterns. The results demonstrate that sacred groves consistently store substantial carbon irrespective of size or elevation, whereas biodiversity conservation is strongly influenced by grove extent and elevation. These findings underscore the role of sacred groves as effective nature‐based solutions, where traditional stewardship supports both biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation in human‐dominated landscapes. Integrating systematic management and ecological restoration practices into existing conservation frameworks, with active community participation, is recommended.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70947first seen 2026-11-07 04:58:28
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。