Climate Change Mitigation Intensity and Mitigation Outcomes in the Crop Production Sector: Moderating Role of Experience and Education in Nigeria
ナイジェリアの作物生産部門における気候変動緩和の強度と緩和成果:経験と教育の調整役 (AI 翻訳)
Obianefo Chukwujekwu Aloysius, Chukwu Victor Omoke, Nzeocha Chibuzo Chinwendu, Ebere Obianuju Nwankwo-Offiah, Anyikwa Chikezie Friday, Muojekwu Angela Chinelo
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ナイジェリアの作物生産者331人を対象に、気候変動緩和実践の強度(頻度・規模・期間)が持続可能性、生産性、環境成果に与える影響を分析。緩和強度は三つの成果すべてを有意に改善するが、経験は生産性向上の限界効果を減少させる。教育の効果は非有意。ATASP-1プログラムの下での普及と資金支援の改善が示唆される。
English
This study of 331 Nigerian crop farmers examines the effect of mitigation practice intensity (frequency, scale, duration) on sustainability, productivity, and environmental outcomes. Mitigation intensity significantly improves all three outcomes. Experience positively moderates sustainability but reduces marginal gains in productivity; education is insignificant. Findings highlight the need for better-targeted extension services and climate-smart financing under the ATASP-1 program.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文はナイジェリアの小規模農家における緩和実践の強度と効果を検証。日本の農業分野での気候変動対策や、アフリカ向け技術協力の参考になる可能性がある。ただし、日本固有の文脈(GX、SSBJ等)との直接的な関連は薄い。
In the global GX context
This paper provides empirical evidence on mitigation intensity-outcome relationships in smallholder agriculture. While not directly applicable to corporate disclosure frameworks, it offers methodological contributions for measuring mitigation effort in agricultural supply chains, relevant for Scope 3 assessments and CDP reporting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers in agricultural mitigation and sustainable intensification can learn from the composite mitigation intensity index and moderation analysis.
🏢実務担当者:Practitioners in agricultural extension and climate-smart financing can use the findings to better target interventions that enhance mitigation intensity.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers in developing countries can consider the role of experience and the need for credit access adjustments to reduce emission pressures.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Climate-smart agriculture has gained attention; most studies focus on adoption rather than the intensity of mitigation practices and how this translates into measurable outcomes. This study therefore examined the effect of climate change mitigation intensity on sustainability, productivity, and environmental outcomes, as well as the moderating role of farmers’ experience and education. Data were collected from 331 crop farmers and analyzed using a composite mitigation intensity index derived from the number, frequency, scale, and duration of practices. Descriptive results show that 65.1% of farmers adopted 5–8 practices, with a mean intensity score of 5.3, while 66.7% operated within a moderate mitigation category. Regression results indicate that mitigation intensity significantly improves sustainability (β = 0.332, p < 0.01) and productivity (β = 1.157, p < 0.01), while also influencing environmental outcomes (β = 0.395, p < 0.01). The models explain a substantial proportion of variation, with R² values of 0.689, 0.527, and 0.801 for sustainability, productivity, and environmental outcomes, respectively. Household size (β = 0.127, p < 0.01) and extension access (β = 0.218, p < 0.05) significantly enhanced productivity, whereas credit access increases emission pressure (β = 0.055, p < 0.01). Moderation results showed that experience improves sustainability (β = 0.002, p < 0.05) but reduces marginal productivity gains (β = -0.018, p < 0.01), while education is not significant. The study concludes that although ATASP-1 has achieved widespread and sustained adoption, improved targeting of extension services and climate-smart financing is required to enhance mitigation intensity and optimize outcomes.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.63002/gres.403.1442first seen 2026-05-30 04:45:48 · last seen 2026-06-08 04:31:12
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。