Pastoral lands and the green transition: opportunities and challenges
牧草地とグリーントランジション：機会と課題 (AI 翻訳)
Jonathan Edward Davies, Suraj Pratap Singh Bhati, Hussein Wario, Maansi Rawat, Ann Waters‐Bayer
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
グリーントランジションは気候・生物多様性危機への対応として、再生可能エネルギーや炭素隔離プロジェクトのための土地需要を生み出している。放牧地は広大で風力・太陽光・炭素貯蔵の可能性が高いため投資家に魅力的だが、多くのプロジェクトが牧畜民の土地権を侵害している。牧畜民の権利を尊重し、公平な利益配分を確保することで、彼らもグリーントランジションの恩恵を受けられることを示す。
English
The green transition, as a global response to climate and biodiversity crises, creates demand for land for renewable energy and carbon sequestration. Rangelands attract investors due to their extent and potential, but many projects alienate pastoralists' land and rights. Experiences show that with respect for pastoralist rights and equitable benefit sharing, they need not be excluded from the green transition.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では規制緩和により太陽光発電が農地に設置される事例が増えており、本論文の牧畜民の権利保護の枠組みは、日本の再生可能エネルギー導入における地域コミュニティとの調整に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global discourse on just transition by highlighting the often-overlooked rights of pastoralists in renewable energy and carbon sequestration projects. It underscores the need for meaningful consultation and equitable benefit sharing, which are central to the ISSB's social sustainability considerations and the broader ESG framework.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a critical perspective on land-use conflicts in the green transition, relevant for researchers studying environmental justice and energy policy.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams involved in land-based carbon offset or renewable energy projects should note the importance of respecting indigenous and local community rights.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should ensure that green transition policies include safeguards for pastoralist and indigenous land rights to achieve a truly just transition.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The green transition–the global response to the climate and biodiversity crises–is generating demand for land to implement renewable-energy and carbon-sequestration projects. Rangelands have been attractive to investors because of their large extent, their high potential for wind and solar energy and for carbon sequestration and storage, and the perception that they are currently misused and easily available. In theory, green-transition projects could benefit pastoralists, but many projects alienate pastoralists’ land, undermine their rights, and weaken their livelihoods. A few projects have been implemented in ways that respect or strengthen pastoralist rights, engage pastoralist communities in meaningful consultation, and ensure equitable benefit sharing. These experiences demonstrate that pastoralists are not inevitable victims of the green transition and do not need to be excluded from green transition opportunities. A just green transition depends on upholding pastoralist rights, enabling their effective participation, and ensuring equitable allocation of benefits.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/past.2026.16429first seen 2026-06-20 05:12:14
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。