← 論文一覧に戻る

A Review of Energy Sustainability Indicators Within Agri-Food Systems

農業食料システムにおけるエネルギー持続可能性指標のレビュー (AI 翻訳)

Tithy Dev, Gabriela-Lucia Sabau, Morteza Haghiri, Lakshman Galagedara, Telex M. N. Ngatched

Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-27#エネルギー転換Origin: Global経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: agriculture
DOI: 10.3390/su18157624
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18157624

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本レビューは、農業食料システム(AFS)のエネルギー持続可能性を評価するためのコア指標フレームワークを体系的に開発した。環境・経済・社会・技術の4次元にわたり、既存指標を批判的に評価・更新し、低炭素で資源効率の高いAFSへの移行を支援する。政策立案と研究の両方に有用なトレードオフ評価の枠組みを提供する。

English

This systematic review develops a core indicators framework for assessing energy sustainability in agri-food systems (AFS). It critically evaluates and updates existing indicators across environmental, economic, social, and technical dimensions, providing a framework for trade-off assessment and policy guidance to support low-carbon, resilient, and resource-efficient AFS transitions.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の農業・食品産業はエネルギー多消費型であり、GXに向けた指標整備が急務。本フレームワークは、農林水産省の政策や企業のサステナビリティ報告に活用可能で、SSBJ開示におけるエネルギー関連指標の選択にも示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

Globally, agri-food systems are significant contributors to GHG emissions, and this framework supports alignment with TCFD/ISSB disclosure requirements by offering standardized energy sustainability indicators. It aids policymakers and companies in tracking progress toward low-carbon transitions and enhancing resilience in food supply chains.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive indicator framework for assessing energy sustainability in agri-food systems, useful for further empirical studies.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a set of indicators that can be adopted for sustainability reporting and energy management in agri-food operations.

🏛政策担当者:Supports the development of policies and regulations for energy sustainability in the agri-food sector.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Achieving energy sustainability is a major challenge across all sectors of an economy. In agri-food systems (AFSs), this challenge is twofold in the context of energy sustainability; one challenge is to reduce fossil fuel dependency, and another challenge is to provide safe and nutritious food for humans and animals. An appropriate aggregate indicator needs to be used for assessing the energy sustainability of AFSs. This study presents a systematic literature review aimed at developing a core indicators framework to support both research and policymaking. It also critically evaluates and updates existing indicators currently used to evaluate energy sustainability in AFSs, considering environmental, economic, social and technical dimensions. Environmental indicators, such as energy use efficiency, net energy balance, carbon footprint, exergy destruction and renewable energy share, measure the ecological impacts of agricultural practices. Economic indicators, including energy cost share, levelized cost of energy, energy return on investment, and productivity per unit of energy input, reflect how energy use influences farm competitiveness and resilience. Social indicators such as equitable access to energy, labor productivity gains, and system resilience to energy shocks highlight the broader human and societal aspects of energy sustainability. Technical indicators, including technology performance, maintenance intensity, technology lifespan, and resource circularity, emphasize the need to minimize resource depletion and environmental harm. Together, these sustainability indicators provide a strong framework for assessing trade-offs and guiding policy decisions that support the transition toward low-carbon, resilient, and resource-efficient AFSs. Their effective development and implementation require interdisciplinary knowledge integration and active engagement with relevant societal stakeholders in a transdisciplinary sustainability context.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。