モロッコ・中国・ノルウェーにおける炭素緩和ガバナンス戦略
Carbon mitigation governance strategies in Morocco, China, and Norway (原題)
Aida Arbi Nefzi, Fathi Bouzidi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、パリ協定の緩和目標と各国の実施政策との乖離を、モロッコ・中国・ノルウェーの比較事例分析で検証する。炭素税、排出量取引制度、再エネ投資などの緩和手段の実装を、経済・制度・技術・環境条件の違いに着目して評価する。国際目標と国内政策成果の持続的乖離、特に新興国におけるガバナンス非対称性と公平性の課題を指摘し、画一的な政策処方ではなく適応的・差別化された包摂的メカニズムの必要性を論じる。
English
This study compares how Paris Agreement mitigation goals are translated into national policy in Morocco, China, and Norway. Using comparative policy analysis and descriptive climate indicators, it assesses carbon taxation, emissions trading, and renewable-energy investment across differing economic and institutional contexts. It finds persistent gaps between international objectives and national outcomes, highlighting governance asymmetries and equity concerns, and argues for adaptive, differentiated, and inclusive climate governance rather than uniform prescriptions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は炭素税・GXリーグ・排出量取引制度の設計段階にあり、新興国と先進国の制度差を踏まえた適応的ガバナンス論は、SSBJ開示やカーボンプライシング政策の議論に示唆を与える。特に公平性・移行支援の視点は日本のアジア移行金融戦略と接続する。
In the global GX context
The paper speaks to global debates on carbon pricing design and just transition under the Paris Agreement, offering cross-continental evidence on why uniform policy prescriptions fail. It is relevant to ISSB/TCFD-aligned disclosure discussions insofar as disclosure quality depends on underlying national mitigation governance capacity.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:比較政策分析の枠組みと、制度・経済条件が緩和実装をどう規定するかの実証的視点を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:炭素税・ETS・再エネ投資が事業拠点国ごとに異なる規制環境を生むことを理解し、国別コンプライアンス戦略に活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:画一的な政策移植ではなく、各国の能力と公平性に応じた適応的カーボンプライシング設計の必要性を示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study examines the gap between the mitigation objectives promoted under the Paris Agreement and their implementation within contrasting national contexts. Using Morocco, China, and Norway as strategically selected cross-continental case studies, the paper evaluates how shared international climate commitments are translated into national mitigation policies under different economic, institutional, technological, and environmental conditions. Through comparative policy analysis, descriptive climate indicators, and governance assessment, the study examines the implementation of carbon taxation, emissions trading systems, renewable-energy investment, and related mitigation instruments. The comparison highlights persistent divergences between internationally articulated mitigation objectives and their translation into national policy outcomes. Particular attention is given to governance asymmetries and equity considerations, especially in emerging economies such as Morocco, where structural and institutional constraints shape mitigation capacity. The analysis demonstrates that effective climate governance cannot rely on uniform policy prescriptions; rather, it requires adaptive, differentiated, and inclusive mechanisms that align global responsibilities with local capabilities. By situating carbon mitigation within its political, economic, and institutional contexts, the paper contributes to ongoing debates on the design of more effective, just, and context-sensitive climate governance strategies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04602-xfirst seen 2026-09-22 04:39:47
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。