← 論文一覧に戻る

公正な農業食料移行:中小企業に対する相反する脱炭素経路の含意の評価

Just Agri‐Food Transitions: Assessing the Implications of Contrasting Decarbonisation Pathways for Small Businesses (原題)

Elpida Apostolopoulou, William Eadson, Caroline Linhares

Geo: Geography and Environment📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-01#エネルギー転換Origin: Global経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: agriculture
DOI: 10.1002/geo2.70109
原典: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/geo2.70109
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、ネットゼロ農業食料システムへの「公正な移行」における中小企業の位置づけを検討する。半体系的文献レビューを通じ、農業食料の公正移行と中小企業脱炭素化の研究を統合し、①中小企業の現状理解、②移行経路別の影響分析枠組み、③移行に伴う公正性の論点を整理する。さらに、地域化・需要主導の食生活転換・技術主導の集約化という3経路のアーキタイプ枠組みを提示し、機会と課題、トレードオフを事例で示す。

English

This article examines small businesses' place in just transitions to net-zero agri-food systems. Through a semi-systematic literature review, it synthesises agri-food just transition and small-business decarbonisation scholarship, building a framework to analyse implications across three pathways: localisation, demand-led dietary shifts, and intensive tech-led transitions. It identifies opportunities, challenges, and trade-offs for different firms along the supply chain.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では食品・農業分野のScope3や中小サプライヤーの排出把握がSSBJ・有報対応で課題となる。本稿の公正移行枠組みは、中小企業の脱炭素支援策やサプライチェーン・エンゲージメント設計を考える際の視点を提供する。

In the global GX context

Globally, just transition debates increasingly intersect with ISSB/CSRD-driven supply-chain disclosure, where SMEs are the hardest to reach. This paper adds a justice lens to agri-food decarbonisation pathways, useful for framing transition finance and SME-inclusive disclosure policy.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:農業食料の公正移行と中小企業脱炭素化を接合する新たな研究アジェンダと分析枠組みを提供する。

🏢実務担当者:サプライチェーン上の中小サプライヤーとの脱炭素協働や公正性配慮の設計に示唆を与える。

🏛政策担当者:農業食料の移行政策において中小企業の包摂と公正性をどう組み込むかの論点を提示する。

📄 Abstract(原文)

This article examines the position of small businesses within just transitions to net zero agri‐food systems. Decarbonising global agri‐food systems is fundamental to net zero goals. Decarbonisation processes have varying implications for different people and across different geographies, prompting concerns for equity and inclusion. In this context, there has been a growing concern for a ‘just transition’ to net zero. To date, small businesses have not been considered a concern for just transition, but examination of the agri‐food system highlights their importance in achieving an inclusive and equitable transition. Drawing from a semi‐systematic literature review, we provide a thematic analysis of agri‐food transitions, synthesising a novel research agenda through combining agri‐food just transition and small business decarbonisation scholarship. In our review, we (1) investigate existing understanding of the position of small businesses within agri‐food transitions; (2) produce a framework to analyse implications for small firms under different transition pathways; and (3) outline the transition‐induced justice considerations that arise. Highlighting key research gaps and moving beyond existing literature, we develop an archetypal transitions framework to conceptualise and better understand what a just transition for agri‐food small businesses looks like in three different, but interrelated, pathways: (a) agri‐food system localisation; (b) demand‐led dietary transitions; and (c) intensive tech‐led transitions. Analysing these pathways, we identify key points of opportunity and challenge for different types of business across the agri‐food supply chain. Through case study examples, we uncover the interrelationships and trade‐offs that net zero transitions create for small businesses. Providing broader implications for agri‐food sustainability, our framework shapes future research avenues, allowing for rethinking of small business agri‐food just transitions and reimagining more equitable agri‐food systems, built upon solidarity.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。