稲わらエネルギー利用における炭素排出削減会計と炭素取引メカニズムの分析
Carbon Emission Reduction Accounting and Carbon Trading Mechanism Analysis of Straw Energy Utilization (原題)
Hao Li
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
稲わら等の農業バイオマスエネルギー利用を対象に、炭素排出削減の算定手法と炭素取引メカニズムの研究動向を文献計量・分類分析で整理したレビュー。ガス化混焼やペレット、バイオガス、バイオエタノール等多様な利用形態を、ライフサイクル評価・IPCC法・GIS空間分析等の算定手法と比較。削減・隔離効果は大きいが、算定境界の不統一や地域パラメータ欠如、小規模プロジェクトの認証困難・検証コスト高といった課題を指摘し、全ライフサイクル算定体系の構築と炭素市場との結合を提言する。
English
A bibliometric and classification review of carbon accounting methods and carbon trading mechanisms for straw-based bioenergy. It compares gasification co-firing, pellet co-firing, biogas and bioethanol pathways against LCA, IPCC and GIS-based accounting approaches. Straw energy shows strong reduction and sequestration potential, but inconsistent boundaries, missing regional parameters, costly verification of small projects and weak market incentives remain. The authors call for full-lifecycle accounting systems and deeper coupling with carbon markets.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では農業系バイオマスのJ-クレジット制度や排出量取引制度（GX-ETS）の議論が進む。本レビューは小規模分散型プロジェクトの認証コストや算定境界の課題を整理しており、国内クレジット制度設計やSSBJ開示における生物由来炭素の扱いを検討する際の参考になる。
In the global GX context
As Article 6, voluntary carbon markets and CSRD/ISSB disclosure raise questions about biomass carbon accounting boundaries, this review maps the methodological fragmentation (LCA vs IPCC vs GIS) and verification-cost barriers facing smallholder bioenergy projects. It offers a comparative reference for strengthening MRV and market access for agricultural carbon credits globally.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:バイオマス炭素会計の算定手法間の差異と炭素市場接続の研究ギャップを俯瞰できる。
🏢実務担当者:農業バイオマス事業の炭素クレジット化における算定境界・検証コストの実務課題を把握できる。
🏛政策担当者:小規模分散型プロジェクトの認証簡素化と炭素市場設計の論点を政策検討に活用できる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
As the “dual carbon” goals and the rural revitalization strategy are jointly advanced, straw energy utilization is a key pathway for the resource utilization of agricultural solid waste and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. This study uses bibliometric and classification analysis methods to systematically review the domestic and international research progress in the two core areas of straw biomass energy carbon emission accounting and carbon trading mechanisms. It integrates straw gasification coupled with coal combustion, biomass granulation and co firing, biogas fermentation, bioethanol conversion and other diversified utilization scenarios, compares accounting methods such as full life cycle assessment, IPCC accounting, GIS spatial analysis, etc., and analyzes the application models, action path and practical challenges of carbon trading mechanisms. Research shows that straw energy utilization has significant carbon reduction and carbon sequestration effects. However, there are some problems with carbon reduction accounting, such as inconsistent boundaries and missing regional parameters. Carbon trading also has some limitations, such as difficulties in certifying small and micro projects, high verification costs, and insufficient market-oriented benefits. In the future, need to establish a full lifecycle accounting system, simplify the carbon verification process, and promote the deep coupling of straw energy and carbon market. This study provides a theoretical reference for low-carbon utilization of agricultural biomass and localized optimization of carbon trading mechanisms.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.54097/rzxazk89first seen 2026-11-06 04:46:03
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。