Analysis and Comparison of the Techniques and Methods Used in Carbon Capturing and Storage (CCS): A Review
炭素回収・貯留（CCS）に用いられる技術と手法の分析と比較：レビュー (AI 翻訳)
A.O. Araoyinbo, B.A. Ogunkola, O.N. Olasehinde, S. O. Ongbali
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューでは、CO2回収・貯留技術（前燃焼、後燃焼、酸素燃焼、DAC、BECCS、鉱物炭酸化など）を体系的に比較し、各手法の技術的特徴、利点、欠点を明らかにする。特に、各技術のコスト、エネルギー消費、実装の課題を評価し、ステークホルダーが最適な手法を選択するための指針を提供する。
English
This review systematically compares carbon capture and storage (CCS) techniques including pre-combustion, post-combustion, oxyfuel combustion, direct air capture (DAC), BECCS, and mineral carbonation. It evaluates each method's advantages, drawbacks, costs, and energy requirements, aiming to guide stakeholders in selecting appropriate technologies for mitigating climate change.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では石炭火力や産業分野でのCCS導入が進められているが、貯留サイトの確保が課題である。本レビューは各種CCS技術のコストや特性を比較しており、日本における技術選定や政策立案の参考となる。
In the global GX context
Globally, CCS is recognized as a key mitigation technology in IPCC pathways. This review offers a clear comparative framework for stakeholders navigating the trade-offs among different capture methods, especially as DAC and BECCS gain attention for negative emissions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a broad overview of CCS techniques for researchers entering the field.
🏢実務担当者:Helps corporate sustainability teams evaluate and select appropriate CCS technologies for their operations.
🏛政策担当者:Informs policymakers on the relative merits and limitations of various CCS methods for national decarbonization strategies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This review examines and compares various carbon.capturing and storing. techniques, vital in mitigating. Climate. change by directly reducing. CO 2 from power plants, industrial. sources, and the atmosphere. We explore pre-combustion, post-combustion, oxyfuel. combustion, direct. air capture, bioenergy with CCS (BECCS), mineral carbonation, and novel materials for CO 2 Capture, shedding light on their unique technologies, uses, advantages, and drawbacks. While oxyfuel combustion. and pre-combustion capture CO 2 efficiently, they are complicated and expensive. Post-combustion capture fits well with existing plants but demands significant energy. Direct air. capture can be used anywhere and targets widespread emissions, though it is costly. BECCS offers the possibility of detrimental emissions through the use. of biomass but encounters sustainability challenges. Mineral carbonation provides lasting CO 2 storage but faces slow reaction times and high energy needs. This review aims to guide stakeholders in understanding the trade-offs and best uses of each method, aiding in the effective implementation of .carbon capture .and storage .technologies to combat global warming.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003782254-45first seen 2026-07-29 05:08:37
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。