時空間特性と生産・展開経路を考慮した風力発電の全球炭素削減効果の評価
Assessing global carbon mitigation benefits of wind power with spatiotemporal characteristics and production-deployment pathways (原題)
Jingyan Yang, Shangheng Yao, Chaojun Li, Yuqi Su, Xuan Zhang, Guori Huang, Xi Lu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
風力発電の炭素削減効果を時空間ライフサイクル評価で分析。2014-2023年の累積純削減量は3,690 Mt CO2e、排出は直接削減の8.5%。将来シナリオでは気候優先展開で2060年までに53,711 Mt CO2eと基準の約2.3倍。グリッド脱炭素化により一部シナリオで効果が減少・負転化する可能性を示した。
English
A spatiotemporal life cycle assessment quantifies wind power's carbon mitigation benefits. Historical net mitigation reached 3,690 Mt CO2e (2014-2023), with emissions at 8.5% of direct displacement benefits. Climate-priority deployment could boost cumulative mitigation to 53,711 Mt CO2e by 2060, ~2.3x baseline. Grid decarbonization may erode benefits in some scenarios, highlighting the need for coordinated planning.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の再エネ導入拡大と送電網整備に示唆。風力発電の立地と系統脱炭素化の連携が重要で、国際的なサプライチェーン調整が炭素削減効果を高める可能性を示す。日本のエネルギー政策や企業の再エネ調達戦略に参考となる。
In the global GX context
Provides global evidence on optimizing wind power deployment for climate benefits, relevant to ISSB-aligned transition planning and international cooperation. Highlights that grid decarbonization and supply chain configuration are critical for maximizing mitigation, informing corporate and policy strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Methodological framework for spatiotemporal LCA of renewables; useful for energy system modeling and carbon accounting research.
🏢実務担当者:Insights for optimizing wind power project siting and supply chain to maximize carbon credits and align with climate targets.
🏛政策担当者:Evidence for international coordination in wind power deployment and grid planning to enhance mitigation effectiveness.
📄 Abstract(原文)
As wind power capacity continues expanding, its carbon-reduction effectiveness increasingly hinges on the spatiotemporal alignment of production, deployment, and power systems. However, these dimensions are assessed separately, and the role of spatiotemporal interactions in shaping carbon mitigation benefits remains unclear. Here, we develop a spatiotemporal life cycle assessment framework and systematically evaluate the carbon mitigation benefits of global onshore wind power across historical (2014-2023) and future (2025-2060) periods. We show that global wind power achieved cumulative net carbon mitigation benefits of 3,690 Mt CO2e over 2014-2023, while carbon emissions accounted for 8.5% of the direct carbon mitigation benefits from fossil-fuel electricity displacement. Under counterfactual settings, the climate-priority deployment scenario (C3) increases cumulative mitigation to 53,711 ± 935 Mt CO2e by 2060, approximately 2.3 times that of the baseline deployment scenario (C1). The clean-oriented production scenario (M3) yields comparatively modest gains, reducing carbon emissions by approximately 14% relative to the baseline production scenario (M1). The spatially diversified production scenario (M2) achieves the lowest transportation emissions, with cumulative reductions of approximately 6% and approximately 24% relative to M1 and M3. Under the baseline and balanced deployment scenarios (C1/C2), annual net mitigation peaks around 2034 and then declines persistently. In some production-deployment combinations, it turns negative by 2060 due to grid decarbonization. Conversely, scenario C3 remains positive throughout 2025-2060. The work provides scientific evidence for enhancing the carbon mitigation effectiveness of wind power development and boosting climate benefits through international coordinated planning, alongside decision support for optimizing wind power deployment and supply chain configurations.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.20517/cf.2026.63first seen 2026-09-06 05:15:41
- primary_source https://doi.org/10.20517/cf.2026.63first seen 2026-09-14 00:28:24
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。