← 論文一覧に戻る

A comparative analysis of climate change policy frameworks in China and the US

中国と米国の気候変動政策枠組みの比較分析 (AI 翻訳)

Khaled Al-Kassimi, Muhammad Atif, Tabinda Saeed

Cogent Social Sciences📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-23#政策Origin: Global
DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2026.2684099
原典: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2684099
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

新現実主義の枠組みを用いて、米中両国の気候変動政策の形成過程を比較分析。国内制度と国家優先事項が排出削減や再生可能エネルギー開発に与える影響を検討し、両国の政策の類似点と相違点を明らかにする。気候ガバナンスにおける戦略的関係と協調の可能性を評価する。

English

Using a neoclassical realist framework, this study compares climate policy development in the US and China, focusing on how domestic institutions and state priorities shape emissions reduction and renewable energy strategies. It identifies similarities and differences in policymaking and assesses prospects for coordinated climate action between the two powers.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX政策は米中関係の影響を受けるため、両国の政策動向を理解する上で参考になる。ただし、日本固有の文脈(SSBJや有報など)への直接的な示唆は限定的。

In the global GX context

This comparative analysis contributes to global understanding of climate governance dynamics between major emitters, relevant for international policy coordination and transition finance discussions.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:気候政策の比較研究における理論的枠組みの適用例として参考になる。

🏛政策担当者:米中の政策動向を踏まえた国際交渉戦略の検討に有用。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Climate change is a systemic global crisis characterized by long term shifts in average weather patterns, driven primarily by human activities such as greenhouse gas emissions, land-use change, deforestation, and broader ecological degradation. The phenomenon affects both developed and developing states, shaping policy responses across different political and economic systems. Using a neoclassical realist (NCR) framework, this study investigates the development of climate change policy in the United States and China. The analysis focuses on how domestic institutional structures and state priorities influence each country’s approach to emissions reduction, emissions limits, and renewable energy development. Through a comparative analysis, the study identifies key similarities and differences in their policymaking processes and strategic orientation. The research draws on a wide range of secondary sources, including peer-reviewed articles, government reports, monographs, and policy analysis which are examined using qualitative methods. The findings provide substantial insights into the strategic relations between the United States and China in the context of climate governance, assessing the prospects of coordinated (or diplomatic) emissions reductions and the observance of expanded investments in renewable energy. The study concludes by highlighting the central role of these two powers in shaping the process of global climate regulation and cooperation.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。