Territorial Energy Sustainability: A Framework for Just Energy Transitions in Latin America’s Extractive Economies—The Case of Colombia
領土的エネルギー持続可能性：ラテンアメリカの資源依存経済における公正なエネルギー移行の枠組み—コロンビアの事例 (AI 翻訳)
María Cecilia Ruiz Cardona, Carlos Humberto González Escobar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
コロンビアの水力中心の電力構成と化石燃料輸出の矛盾に着目し、公正なエネルギー移行を阻む要因を批判的言説分析、メガプロジェクト事例、参加型ワークショップから析出。6つの横断的知見と、政策介入の5レベルを備えた「領土的エネルギー持続可能性（SET）」枠組みを提示する。
English
This study examines Colombia's paradox of clean electricity coexisting with fossil fuel exports and energy-poor territories. Using critical discourse analysis, case studies, and participatory workshops, it identifies six barriers to just transition and proposes the Territorial Energy Sustainability (SET) framework with five policy intervention levels, offering a transferable model for extractive economies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ開示やGX推進が進むが、地域間格差や社会的公正の視点は相対的に弱い。本枠組みは、エネルギー移行における地域主体の包摂や政策の多層性を考える上で示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global just transition scholarship by integrating territorial and epistemological dimensions often missing in techno-economic frameworks. Its SET framework offers a transferable policy model for energy-exporting countries in the Global South, complementing ISSB/CSRD disclosure trends with social equity considerations.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a novel framework (SET) linking sustainability transitions theory with Latin American critical thought, useful for comparative just transition research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers policy intervention levels and participatory methods that can inform community engagement and territorial planning in energy projects.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights governance and participation gaps that can guide the design of more inclusive and effective just transition policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Colombia condenses a paradox common across Latin America’s extractive economies: one of the region’s cleanest electricity matrices—close to 60% of installed capacity is hydropower—coexists with large-scale coal and oil exports, while renewable potential concentrates in ethnic and peasant territories that remain energy-poor. Although the country has enacted an ambitious just-transition framework, conflicts persist. This study asks which epistemological and ontological factors constrain or enable that transition. Using an interpretive-critical qualitative design, it triangulates four evidentiary pillars: critical discourse analysis of policy instruments, a structured critical review of the academic and policy literature, six megaproject case studies, and ten participatory workshops with 259 territorial actors across nine departments. Six recurrent, cross-case findings emerge: epistemological asymmetry, ontological irreducibility of territory, participation reduced to procedure, fragmented governance, the Caribbean territorial paradox (La Guajira combines the country’s highest renewable potential with its lowest electricity coverage), and unresolved fiscal dependence on hydrocarbons. The study’s novelty is Territorial Energy Sustainability (SET), a six-condition framework that articulates sustainability-transitions theory with Latin American critical thought and operationalizes it into five levels of policy intervention, offering a transferable framework for energy-exporting countries of the Global South pursuing transitions that transform rather than reproduce inequality.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147266first seen 2026-08-06 04:50:19
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。