From action to legislation: challenges and enhancements of the regulatory frameworks concerning China’s blue carbon sink trading
行動から立法へ：中国のブルーカーボンシンク取引に関する規制枠組みの課題と強化 (AI 翻訳)
Chuanliang Wang, Zhaoxin Liu, Aiping Wang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、中国のブルーカーボンシンク取引に関する規制枠組みの課題を分析。生態環境法典に組み込まれたが、専門的な立法が不足しており、監督管理に規範的限界がある。規制主体の権限配分、取引ルール、法的責任の3次元から問題を特定し、強化のための提言を行う。
English
This paper systematically reviews China's laws and policies on blue carbon sink trading, identifying three core regulatory problems: vague allocation of powers, incomplete transaction rules, and weak accountability. It provides recommendations for clarifying regulatory roles, improving project declaration rules, and strengthening legal liability frameworks.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国のブルーカーボン取引規制に関する論文だが、日本のGX政策（カーボンクレジット制度、Jブルークレジットなど）への示唆を含む。特にブルーカーボンの法制度設計は、日本でもブルーカーボンクレジットの普及が進む中で参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper offers a detailed legal analysis of blue carbon trading regulation in China, a rapidly developing area in global carbon markets. The identified challenges—regulatory overlap, missing transaction rules, and weak enforcement—are relevant for any jurisdiction developing blue carbon frameworks, including those under the Paris Agreement and voluntary carbon markets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a legal and policy analysis framework for studying carbon sink trading regulation, useful for comparative research between China and other countries.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into regulatory risks and gaps in China's blue carbon market, relevant for companies engaged in carbon credit projects or trading in China.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights necessary legislative elements for effective blue carbon trading, including clear regulatory roles, systematic transaction rules, and robust accountability.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The Ecological Environment Code of the People’s Republic of China has incorporated ecosystem carbon sinks into the legal system, yet there remains a lack of specialized legislation for blue carbon sink trading, with obvious normative limitations in its supervision and management. This research mainly adopts a combined research method integrating normative analysis, legal doctrine analysis, and qualitative policy text analysis. It systematically reviews China’s existing laws and policies related to carbon sinks and analyzes the institutional status of blue carbon sink trading supervision and management from three dimensions: subject, content, and liability. The study identifies three core problems in the current supervision system: vague and nominal allocation of powers and responsibilities among regulatory subjects with prominent functional overlaps; missing and imbalanced transaction process rules lacking systematic planning; and a weak and formalistic accountability mechanism with unclear responsibility boundaries. To enhance the regulatory frameworks, at least three areas should be addressed: first, clarify the rules of regulatory entities, and build a complementary, professional and efficient supervision mechanism. Second, enhance rules of the regulatory bodies, along with rules for the declaration and registration of blue carbon sink projects. Finally, strengthen rules of legal liabilities for the supervision and management of blue carbon sink trading, clarifying the provisions on the legal liabilities of relevant entities, and enhancing the effectiveness of legal liability pursuit.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2026.1815655first seen 2026-05-15 18:21:23
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。