Screening of carbon fiber reinforced composites for reduced fiber usage in type IV hydrogen pressure vessels
タイプIV水素圧力容器における繊維使用量削減のための炭素繊維強化複合材料のスクリーニング (AI 翻訳)
Niclas Richter, Youssef Mraidi, Stephan Sprenger, S. Zaremba, Klaus Drechsler
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、タイプIV水素圧力容器における炭素繊維使用量削減を目的として、7種類の代替複合材料システムをスクリーニングした。その結果、シラン変性マトリックスが性能とプロセス安定性のバランスに優れ、多基準評価フレームワークが材料選定のトレードオフを可視化することを示した。
English
This study screens seven alternative carbon fiber composite systems for Type IV hydrogen pressure vessels to reduce fiber usage. Results show that a silane-modified matrix offers the best balance of mechanical performance and process stability. A multi-criteria evaluation framework highlights trade-offs between performance and industrial viability.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は水素社会の実現に向けて水素ステーションや燃料電池車の普及を進めており、本論文はタイプIV水素圧力容器の炭素繊維使用量削減によりコスト低減に貢献する。材料選定の多基準評価フレームワークは日本の素材メーカーや容器メーカーにとって有用な指針となる。
In the global GX context
Hydrogen storage is critical for the energy transition, and this paper presents a cost-reduction strategy for Type IV vessels through material optimization. The multi-criteria screening framework is a practical tool for composite selection in hydrogen storage applications worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This paper provides a systematic method for screening composite materials, highlighting trade-offs between performance and processability.
🏢実務担当者:The evaluation framework offers a clear basis for selecting cost-effective composite systems for hydrogen pressure vessels.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This work presents a structured screening of seven alternative carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) systems for use in Type IV hydrogen pressure vessels. The objective was to reduce carbon fiber usage while maintaining mechanical integrity and industrial viability. The investigated configurations included matrix-modified epoxies, chemically functionalized fibers, and a high-strength fiber variant. All laminates were manufactured using wet filament winding and assessed through standardized mechanical and thermal testing. To capture industrial relevance beyond material performance, a criteria-based evaluation framework was applied, incorporating processability, cost, scalability, sustainability, and regulatory compatibility. The results show that most variants achieved structural performance comparable to the reference system. A combined nanofiller–silane matrix delivered the highest strength values but exhibited reduced process stability, while a silane-modified matrix provided a more balanced performance profile with favorable practical scores. A radar-based comparison across five evaluation axes highlights trade-offs between mechanical performance and implementation feasibility. The study demonstrates that multi-dimensional screening approaches are essential for identifying viable composite systems at an early development stage. The proposed evaluation framework is transferable in its methodological structure and decision logic, while absolute numerical scores remain application- and dataset-dependent.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844261419576first seen 2026-05-05 23:47:35
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。