Slow recovery of stable carbon constrains long‐term soil carbon restoration in China's restored wetlands
安定炭素の回復遅延が中国の復元湿地における長期的な土壌炭素回復を制約する (AI 翻訳)
Ting Wang, Xiangling Zhou, 苏丽菲, Siqi Zheng, S Liu, Y C Liu, Weimin Quan, Tingting Hu, J Huang, Yuanbin Cai, Shihua Li, Pingping Guo, Min Luo
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
中国43ヵ所の復元湿地から452のペアデータを解析し、易分解性有機炭素(LOC)と難分解性有機炭素(ROC)の回復軌跡を定量化。60年後、LOCは自然湿地の約50%、ROCは約37%にしか回復せず、全体の土壌有機炭素(SOC)は約39%に留まった。ROCの回復は粘土含有量、pH、塩分に制約され、安定炭素プールの回復が長期的な炭素隔離の律速となることを示した。
English
Analyzing 452 paired comparisons from 43 restored wetland sites across China, this study quantifies recovery trajectories of labile organic carbon (LOC) and recalcitrant organic carbon (ROC). After 60 years, LOC recovered to ~50% of natural levels, ROC to only ~37%, and total SOC to ~39%. ROC recovery was constrained by clay content, pH, and salinity, highlighting that slow stable-carbon recovery limits long-term carbon sequestration in restored wetlands.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では湿地再生による炭素貯留効果が注目されているが、本結果は安定炭素プールの回復が遅いことを示し、炭素クレジット評価に「難分解性炭素」指標の導入が必要であることを示唆する。
In the global GX context
This study underscores that restoration assessments relying solely on bulk soil organic carbon may overestimate long-term carbon sequestration. For global restoration and carbon offset programs, integrating stable carbon metrics (e.g., ROC) is critical for accurate climate benefit accounting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on distinct recovery dynamics of labile vs. stable carbon pools, informing carbon cycle models and restoration ecology.
🏢実務担当者:Recommends incorporating recalcitrant organic carbon measurements to evaluate long-term carbon sequestration in wetland restoration projects.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that carbon accounting standards for nature-based solutions should consider stable carbon pools to avoid overestimating climate benefits.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Abstract Wetland restoration is widely implemented to rebuild soil organic carbon (SOC); however, success is still commonly assessed using bulk SOC, which integrates carbon pools with distinct turnover times and stabilization mechanisms, and may therefore misrepresent the recovery of stable carbon. To address this limitation, we compiled a national‐scale dataset of restored wetlands across China (452 paired comparisons from 43 sites) to quantify the recovery trajectories of labile organic carbon (LOC) and recalcitrant organic carbon (ROC), with ROC defined as SOC minus LOC and used as a proxy for the relatively stable SOC pool. LOC and ROC showed distinct associations with restoration drivers: LOC recovery was closely associated with plant biomass and gross primary productivity, whereas ROC recovery was primarily constrained by clay content, pH and salinity. After 60 years of restoration, LOC recovered to approximately 50% of natural wetland levels, ROC reached only ~37%, and overall SOC recovered to ~39%; all three pools exhibited pronounced deceleration within the observed restoration period. Recovery magnitudes of LOC and ROC varied across restoration contexts. Among converted land‐use types, bareland‐derived restorations showed the largest relative increases in LOC and ROC but remained furthest from natural wetland levels, whereas paddy‐derived restorations exhibited the smallest gains yet were closest to natural levels. Across restored wetland types, peatlands showed greater ROC accumulation but more limited LOC accumulation, whereas coastal wetlands showed greater LOC accumulation but more constrained ROC accumulation. Among restoration strategies, combined restoration produced the most sustained increases in both carbon pools over time compared with either planted or rewetted restoration alone. Synthesis and applications . These findings show that the slow recovery of the relatively stable SOC pool constrains long‐term soil carbon restoration in wetlands, underscoring the need to integrate ROC‐based metrics into the evaluation of long‐term carbon sequestration during restoration.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70449first seen 2026-06-18 05:07:51
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。