Shared value vs plural values. Contesting renewable energy projects of the Enel Group
Daniela Del Bene, Roberto Cantoni, Antonio Bontempi, Louisa Jane Di Felice, Giuseppina Siciliano
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
Enel Groupの再エネ事業をめぐる15件の社会環境紛争を、影響を受けるコミュニティの価値・評価言語から分析。環境・健康・社会経済・存在論・政治の5次元に整理し、カウンター会計でボトムアップの不満を収集する。企業が掲げる「共有価値の創造」に対し、地域は多元的・関係的価値観の系統的軽視を訴え、企業の自己付与した道徳的権限を批判する。
English
Analyses 15 socio-environmental conflicts around Enel Group renewable projects through affected communities' values and valuation languages, mapped across environmental, health, socio-economic, ontological and political dimensions using counter-accounting. Argues that while Enel claims 'Creating Shared Value' benefits all, impacted groups contest the corporate transition model and defend plural, relational values that are systematically misrecognised. Critiques the corporate self-attributed moral mandate in the energy transition.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも大規模再エネ（洋上風力・太陽光）の地域合意形成や住民訴訟が増える中、企業主導の「共有価値」型トランジションの限界と、地域の多元的価値の取り込み方針は、事業者・自治体の合意形成設計に直接示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD push companies toward stakeholder and impacted-community disclosure, this paper offers a counter-accounting method to surface grievances that corporate 'shared value' narratives obscure—relevant to just-transition and social-license debates in global disclosure scholarship.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:企業主導の再エネ価値論を環境正義・評価言語の枠組みで批判的に検証する分析視角を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:再エネ事業の社会的受容リスクを「共有価値」の主張だけでなく地域の多元的価値の観点から評価する必要性を示す。
🏛政策担当者:再エネ促進政策において、地域の価値多元性と合意形成プロセスを制度的に組み込む重要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The energy transition triggers urgent questions about what values are important, who controls transitional processes, and who has the power to define the answers to the climate crisis. Energy companies claim their central role in the development of renewable energy as the ultimate solution. However, communities affected by large-scale renewable energy projects have extensively raised environmental and social justice concerns and denounced the industry's poor practices and abuses. In this article, we analyse 15 socio-environmental conflicts around renewable energy projects owned by the Enel Group, one of the world's largest energy utilities, through the values and valuation languages of the affected communities. We map them onto five dimensions: environmental, health-related, socio-economic, ontological, and political. We build on environmental justice and ecological economics literature on valuation languages and employ counter-accounting to gather bottom-up evidence of grievances. We argue that, while the company claims that RE is the ultimate solution and the ‘Creating Shared Value’ approach is beneficial to all parties, those impacted by Enel's projects question the corporate model of energy transition and defend a plurality of values embedded in relational worldviews that are systematically misrecognised. We eventually criticise the corporate self-attributed moral and value-centred mandate in the energy transition and call for inclusive research about desirable energy futures rooted in plural and relational value systems.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109268first seen 2026-11-01 04:39:05 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:36:02
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。