抗議、パンデミック、そして戦争：ドイツのエネルギー転換（Energiewende）を再形成する政治的言説
Protest, pandemic, and war: the political discourse reshaping Germany’s Energiewende (原題)
Sandra Venghaus, Ali Torkayesh, Katharina Böhm, Katrin Arning, Christopher Wood
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ドイツのエネルギー転換（Energiewende）を事例に、2017〜2022年の連邦議会本会議の言説を混合的質的・半定量分析し、Fridays For Future、2021年政権交代、COVID-19、ウクライナ戦争がエネルギー政策目標の優先順位をどう変えたかを追跡。エネルギー三角形の三目標は維持されたが、供給安全保障の相対的重要性が特に高まったことを示す。議会討論分析が各国のエネルギー政策比較評価に有用であることを実証した。
English
Using mixed qualitative/semi-quantitative discourse analysis of German Bundestag plenary sessions (2017–2022), this study traces how Fridays For Future, the 2021 government change, COVID-19, and the Ukraine war reshaped prioritization among the energy triangle's goals. The three core objectives persisted, but security of supply gained distinctive prominence. It demonstrates how parliamentary debate analysis can inform comparative energy-policy assessment across Europe and beyond.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもエネルギー安全保障と脱炭素のトレードオフはGX政策の核心課題であり、危機下での政策優先順位の変動を議会言説から分析する手法は、日本のGX推進・エネルギー政策議論の比較参照として有用。SSBJ開示とは直接接続しないが、政策リスク評価の視点を提供する。
In the global GX context
For global GX scholarship, this offers a replicable method for tracking how crises shift energy-policy priorities, relevant to comparative transition governance and to understanding the political feasibility of decarbonization targets amid supply-security shocks. It complements disclosure-focused research by illuminating the policy discourse that shapes national transition pathways.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:議会言説の混合分析手法と、危機がエネルギー政策目標の優先順位に与える影響の実証例を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:ドイツの政策優先順位の変動は、欧州事業のエネルギー調達・規制リスク評価の参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:危機下でもエネルギー三角形の枠組みを維持しつつ供給安全保障を重視する政策バランスの事例として参考になる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Background The ongoing threat of climate change necessitates a comprehensive restructuring of national energy systems, shifting them from a fossil-fuel basis toward low-carbon pathways to achieve substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. In this context, this work examines the effects of national and global events on climate change mitigation policy, taking the German energy transition, also known as “ Energiewende ” as a case study. By tracing shifts in political discourse, this study examines changing prioritizations among energy policy targets and explores the circumstances that shaped discourse developments during periods of crisis and transformation, as well as the role of key triggers or pre-existing “windows of opportunity” presented by political and social events. The analysis places particular emphasis on specific systemic factors, including the Fridays For Future demonstrations, the 2021 government change, the COVID-19 Pandemic, and the war in Ukraine. Results Using a mixed qualitative/semi-quantitative discourse analysis of Bundestag plenary sessions from 2017 to 2022, the study evaluates the ongoing relevance of the energy triangle approach’s qualitative targets. The energy triangle retained its focus on the three primary energy policy objectives despite the occurrence of various significant systemic events. However, the relative prominence of these targets changed over time and temporally coincided with major systemic developments. Within the energy triangle approach, security of supply in particular assumed a distinctive role within the evolving discourse framework. Conclusions Examining Germany’s political discourse provides insight into the dynamics of energy policy debates during periods of crisis and transformation. Furthermore, the study demonstrates how analyzing parliamentary debates can inform comparative assessments of energy policy developments in various European countries and beyond.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-026-00600-zfirst seen 2026-09-24 04:37:39
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。