Bridging Nature-Based Solutions, Governance and Landscape Architecture: Insights from the Global North and South
自然を基盤とした解決策、ガバナンス、ランドスケープアーキテクチャの架橋：グローバルノースとサウスからの洞察 (AI 翻訳)
Diana Dushkova, Maria Ignatieva, Elvira Dovletyarova
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
自然を基盤とした解決策（NBS）の実装は地域によって不均一であり、政策と設計実践のギャップが課題となっている。本研究は、ガバナンス研究とランドスケープアーキテクチャの統合を提案し、グローバルノースとサウスの比較分析を通じて、文化的・生態学的に応答した設計プロセスの重要性を明らかにした。
English
This paper investigates the gap between policy-oriented NBS discourse and its translation into design practice. It proposes a multi-scale, co-creative framework integrating governance and landscape architecture, based on comparative analysis of Global North and South contexts. The findings emphasize that NBS must be spatially translated through culturally responsive and ecologically informed design processes.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもグリーンインフラやNBSへの関心が高まっているが、本稿は政策と設計実践の統合の重要性を指摘しており、日本の都市計画やランドスケープデザインへの示唆を含む。ただし、直接的なGX（脱炭素）関連性は低い。
In the global GX context
While NBS are strongly embedded in EU policy, this paper highlights the governance-design gap and provides a comparative framework relevant for global climate adaptation and biodiversity strategies. It underscores the need for culturally responsive design in implementing NBS.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This study provides a useful framework for integrating governance and design in NBS research, and the North-South comparison offers insights for contextualizing solutions.
🏢実務担当者:For landscape architects and urban planners, the paper offers a multi-scale co-creative approach to translating NBS policy into site-specific design.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can learn that NBS implementation requires not only policy frameworks but also culturally and ecologically sensitive design processes.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) have emerged as a prominent and rapidly expanding strategic approach for addressing climate change, biodiversity loss, and socio-ecological resilience in cities, especially within European sustainability agendas where NBS are embedded in EU policy frameworks. Nevertheless, their practical implementation remains uneven across the globe, with relatively strong mainstreaming in Europe but more fragmented uptake in other regions. These disparities stem from a gap between policy-oriented NBS discourse and its translation into design and spatial practice. This study investigates how governance-related NBS research can be more effectively translated into landscape architecture and design practice. It integrates insights from narrative literature reviews, project-based experiences, and international conference sessions. We argue that effective NBS implementation requires alignment with landscape architecture (systems-multi-scale planning, design, site-specific ecological materialization and aesthetic mediation) and governance integration. Through comparative analysis of Global North and South contexts, we identify differences in institutional capacity, socio-cultural perception of nature, and knowledge systems that shape NBS implementation. We propose a multi-scale, co-creative framework connecting environmental knowledge, governance interface, and design practice. The findings demonstrate that NBS cannot succeed solely as a science and policy approach; instead, they must be spatially translated through culturally responsive and ecologically informed landscape design processes and maintenance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/land15081342first seen 2026-07-28 05:07:00
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。