← 論文一覧に戻る

デジタル化と再生可能エネルギー比率:156カ国、2010~2022年のエビデンス

Digitalisation and the Renewable‐Energy Share: Evidence From 156 Countries, 2010–2022 (原題)

Lianghan Cong, Shuaiyi Lu, Pan Jiang, Xiaoshu Lü

Sustainable Development📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-20#エネルギー転換Origin: Global対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.1002/sd.71697
原典: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71697

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

156カ国・2010〜2022年の不均衡パネルを用い、デジタル化指数(接続性・インフラ・技術的生産能力の6指標をエントロピー加重TOPSISで統合)と再エネ比率の関係を分析。固定効果モデルではデジタル化指数0.1ポイント上昇が再エネ比率を約3.9%高めると推定。ただし共通要因を考慮すると効果は縮小し、高排出・所得グループ間で差異が見られる。因果ではなく同時点の関連として解釈される。

English

Using an unbalanced panel of 156 countries (2010–2022), this study links a multidimensional digitalisation index (entropy-weighted TOPSIS of six connectivity, infrastructure, and tech-capacity indicators) to renewable-energy share. Fixed-effects models suggest a 0.1-point index rise corresponds to ~3.9% higher renewable share, though the association shrinks after controlling for common factors. Effects are stronger in high-emission contexts and differ by income group; the relationship is contemporaneous, not causal.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX文脈では、デジタル化投資(DX)と再エネ導入・電力システム高度化の相乗効果を議論する材料となる。SSBJ・有報での気候関連開示において、自社のDX投資が再エネ比率や排出削減にどう寄与するかを説明する際の国際的エビデンスとして参照可能。

In the global GX context

For global disclosure scholarship, this adds cross-country empirical evidence that digital-system capacity correlates with renewable-energy transition, relevant to transition-plan credibility under ISSB/CSRD. It cautions that national digital development must be distinguished from broader international trends when companies or governments claim digitalisation-driven decarbonisation.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:デジタル化と再エネ移行の国際的関連を、共通要因・所得グループ・空間モデルで頑健性検証した実証研究として参照できる。

🏢実務担当者:DX投資が再エネ調達や排出削減に寄与する可能性を示す一方、効果は構造条件に依存するため自社文脈での検証が必要。

🏛政策担当者:デジタルインフラ政策と再エネ普及政策の相乗効果を設計する際、所得・排出水準別の差異を考慮すべき示唆を提供。

📄 Abstract(原文)

ABSTRACT Digitalisation has become an important component of the energy transition by improving information exchange, system coordination, and technological innovation. However, its relationship with renewable‐energy deployment remains complex because digital technologies can generate both enabling effects and additional energy demand. This study investigates the association between national digital‐system capacity and renewable‐energy transition using an unbalanced panel of 156 countries from 2010 to 2022. A multidimensional digitalisation index is constructed using entropy‐weighted TOPSIS based on six indicators covering digital connectivity, infrastructure, and technology‐related productive capacity. Renewable‐energy transition is measured by the renewable‐energy share in total final energy consumption, corresponding to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG). The empirical analysis combines fixed‐effects models, common‐correlated‐effects estimation, dynamic‐panel specifications, alternative index constructions, and spatial models to examine the robustness and contextual dependence of the relationship. The results show that higher digital‐system capacity is positively associated with renewable‐energy share in country fixed‐effects models. A 0.1‐point increase in the digitalisation index corresponds to approximately 3.9% higher renewable‐energy share. The estimated association becomes smaller after accounting for common time variation and unobserved common factors, highlighting the importance of distinguishing national digital development from broader international trends. Formal interaction tests further reveal stronger associations in high‐emissions contexts and significant differences across income groups. A CO 2 ‐related pathway decomposition identifies a significant emissions‐related component, while the result is interpreted as a contemporaneous relationship rather than causal mediation. Overall, the findings indicate that digitalisation can contribute to renewable‐energy transition, but its effectiveness depends on technological diffusion, structural conditions, and the characteristics of national energy systems.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。