Socio-Environmental Evaluation of Overload Truck: Carbon Emissions, Carbon Tax, and Policy Intention Perspectives
過積載トラックの社会環境評価：二酸化炭素排出、炭素税、政策意図の観点から (AI 翻訳)
Tamara Latifah Jasmine, Niken Prilandita, Heru Purboyo Hidayat Putro, Gatot Yudoko
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はインドネシアにおける過積載トラック（ODOL）について、燃料消費・CO2排出・炭素税負担の技術的評価と、ドライバーと一般市民の政策受容性調査を行った。技術的にはODOL車両の排出量と税負担が非ODOLより高いことを示し、社会的にはドライバーは経済的インセンティブ、市民は安全意識に影響されることがわかった。
English
This study evaluates overload trucks (ODOL) in Indonesia from technical and social perspectives. Technical analysis shows higher fuel consumption, CO2 emissions, and carbon tax burdens for ODOL trucks. Social survey reveals that drivers' policy acceptance is driven by economic incentives, while the general public is more influenced by safety and public order concerns.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも過積載トラック問題は物流効率と環境負荷の両面で課題である。炭素税導入の議論が進む中、本論文は政策受容性におけるステークホルダー別のアプローチの重要性を示唆する。
In the global GX context
This paper provides empirical evidence on the environmental impact of overload trucks and the social acceptance of carbon pricing, contributing to global discussions on transport decarbonization and policy design tailored to different stakeholder groups.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a combined technical and social evaluation framework for carbon tax and overload truck policies.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for differentiated policy approaches based on stakeholder group preferences when implementing carbon tax and vehicle weight regulations.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The issue of global warming and the increasing concentration of carbon dioxide (CO₂) represents a significant environmental challenge, with the transportation sector contributing approximately 23% of global greenhouse gas emissions. One of the crucial problems is the operation of Over-Dimension Over-Load (ODOL) trucks, which generate serious negative environmental and social impacts. This study conducts a socio-environmental evaluation of ODOL trucks from the perspectives of carbon emissions and carbon tax, and further analyzes the acceptance of the Zero ODOL and Carbon Tax policies in Indonesia. The technical evaluation involves simulates fuel consumption, CO₂ emissions, and carbon tax burdens based on ODOL truck travel data. Meanwhile, the social evaluation is conducted through a survey of two respondent groups, namely truck drivers (97 respondents) and the general public (214 respondents), using a questionnaire that integrates constructs from the Health Belief Model (HBM), risk perception, user cost, law enforcement knowledge (LEK), and the Policy Acceptance Model (PAM). The technical findings indicate that ODOL trucks have higher fuel consumption, CO₂ emissions, and carbon tax burdens compared to non-ODOL trucks. From the social perspective, acceptance of the Zero ODOL policy is influenced by different determinants across the two groups. For drivers, policy acceptance is highly sensitive to economic-based instruments such as carbon tax and knowledge of sanctions. In contrast, the general public is more driven by safety perception, traffic order, and the social impacts of road disturbances. These findings emphasize the importance of tailored policy implementation strategies, where economic incentive–based approaches are more effective for drivers, while safety- and public order–based approaches are more resonant for the public.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.31603/ae.16388first seen 2026-06-16 05:34:43
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。