Common Cause, coopetition or competition? Resource contestation in food waste recovery networks
共通の大義、協調か競争か？食品廃棄物回収ネットワークにおける資源争奪 (AI 翻訳)
Vimala Kunchamboo, Victoria Little, Stephanie Kay Ann Cheah
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
食品廃棄物はサプライチェーン全体で発生し、GHG排出に寄与する。本研究は、消費者の需要がなくなった食品を回収する協力的ネットワークに着目し、参加者間の競争や利害対立がシステムの成果を損なう可能性を、制度ロジックと協調競争の概念を用いて質的ケーススタディで明らかにした。WEIRD文脈に依存しない新たな視点を提供する。
English
Food waste contributes to GHG emissions throughout the supply chain. This qualitative case study examines collaborative networks for recovering unwanted food, revealing that competition and conflicting interests among stakeholders can compromise system performance despite shared sustainability commitments. It offers a new perspective on collaborative network behavior, challenging WEIRD-centric assumptions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では食品ロス削減が政策課題であり、サプライチェーン全体でのGHG排出削減が求められている。本研究成果は、食品回収ネットワークの協調と競争のダイナミクスを理解する上で示唆を与え、日本の食品産業における持続可能なネットワーク構築に貢献し得る。
In the global GX context
Globally, food waste is recognized as a significant contributor to GHG emissions, and reducing it is crucial for climate targets. This study provides insights into the dynamics of collaborative networks, highlighting how competition can undermine sustainability goals, which is relevant for designing effective food recovery systems and supply chain collaborations worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a novel application of coopetition and institutional logic to food recovery networks, offering insights for macromarketing and sustainability research.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights potential conflicts in collaborative food recovery initiatives, informing network design and stakeholder management.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that policies promoting food recovery should consider competitive dynamics among stakeholders to ensure system effectiveness.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Food waste is a problem that occurs throughout the supply chain, squandering natural resources, and contributing to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. While attention has been directed at systems designed to facilitate movement of food from manufacturer to consumers, little is known on alternative practices to recover food products no longer desired by the consumers. Responding to calls for greater attention to systems elements in macromarketing and for work that challenges the WEIRD hegemony, we investigate the issue of how collaborative networks can support more robust food systems. A qualitative case study draws on prolonged participant observation and depth interviews to address the question, “How do stakeholders in collaborative networks achieve shared system outcomes?” We apply institutional logic and the concept of coopetition to explore the dynamics within a food recovery network. Our findings suggest that notwithstanding shared commitments to sustainability, competition and conflicting interests can compromise systems performance. This study contributes a new perspective of collaborative network behaviour and highlights shortfalls in current theory and practices resulting from reliance on data collected from WEIRD contexts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467221113456first seen 2026-08-02 17:53:20
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。