低炭素経済への移行における技術変化・エネルギーシステム転換・包摂的発展の調整
Coordinating Technological Change, Ener-gy-System Transformation and Inclusive De-velopment in the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy (原題)
Fatima Nasser, Ahmed Zayan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、再生可能エネルギー導入・エネルギー効率・経済全体の脱炭素化の関係を既存文献の構造的レビューで整理する。技術学習や政策の信頼性、資金条件、系統統合が再エネ拡大を左右し、効率改善はリバウンド効果等により排出削減に直結しないと指摘する。脱炭素は化石燃料の単純代替ではなく、産業・運輸・建築・消費構造と分配面を含む技術・経済・制度の協調的転換として捉えるべきだと結論づける。
English
This paper reviews recent literature on how renewable deployment, energy efficiency and economy-wide decarbonization interact. It finds that technological learning, policy credibility, financing and grid integration drive renewables, while efficiency gains do not automatically cut emissions due to rebound effects. Decarbonization is framed as a coordinated technological, economic and institutional transformation, with distributional and inclusion concerns integrated into transition strategy.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではGX推進法・GX経済移行債や第7次エネルギー基本計画が、再エネ拡大と産業競争力・公正な移行の両立を課題としており、本レビューの「効率改善≠排出削減」という指摘は国内政策・企業の脱炭素戦略設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
For global disclosure scholarship, this review reinforces the ISSB/TCFD-era shift from simple emissions accounting toward transition-plan credibility, financing conditions and just-transition considerations — useful framing for how companies should narrate coordinated transition strategies rather than renewable substitution alone.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー転換・効率・分配を横断する研究課題の整理枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:再エネ調達や効率投資を排出削減と直結させず、リバウンド効果や移行計画の整合性を検討する材料になる。
🏛政策担当者:政策の信頼性・系統・資金メカニズムと分配面を一体で設計する必要性を示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The transition toward low-carbon development requires simultaneous transformation of energy supply, energy demand and the institutional structures that govern technological and economic change. This paper examines the relationships among renewable-energy deployment, energy efficiency and economy-wide decarbonization through a structured review of recent literature. The first dimension highlights technological learning, declining renewable costs, policy credibility, financing conditions, grid integration and storage as major determinants of renewable-energy expansion. The second focuses on energy efficiency, rebound effects, electrification, behavioral responses, digitalization and demand-side flexibility, showing that technical improvements do not automatically translate into proportional reductions in energy consumption or emissions. The third considers the broader development implications of energy transition through economic growth, green innovation, climate finance, corporate transformation and energy justice. The literature indicates that renewable energy and efficiency can reinforce economic and environmental performance when they are supported by stable policies, adequate infrastructure, technological innovation and appropriate financial mechanisms. However, successful decarbonization also depends on structural changes in industry, transport, buildings and consumption patterns. Moreover, distributional consequences must be integrated into transition strategies to ensure that environmental gains are accompanied by employment opportunities, affordability and social inclusion. Low-carbon development should therefore be approached as a coordinated technological, economic and institutional transformation rather than as the simple substitution of fossil fuels by renewable energy.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23072131first seen 2026-10-02 04:49:13 · last seen 2026-10-02 04:49:14
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。