An ecosystem approach to circular economy implementation and efficiency: A global comparative analysis
循環経済の実装と効率性に対するエコシステムアプローチ：グローバル比較分析 (AI 翻訳)
Kevin Ibrahim Suryo
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、インドネシアにおける循環経済（CE）の導入をエコシステムの観点から分析し、EU、中国、フィンランドなどの先進モデルと比較する。9つのインドネシアのイニシアチブを評価し、材料節約や排出削減の定量的成果を示す一方、政策の断片化や資金不足などの障壁を特定する。結論として、国家ロードマップの策定、グリーンボンドなどの金融手段の強化、公共調達への循環基準の組み込みを提言する。
English
This study analyzes Indonesia's circular economy (CE) adoption through an ecosystem lens, benchmarking against leading models like EU, China, and Finland. It evaluates nine Indonesian initiatives, showing quantitative gains in material savings and emission reductions, while identifying barriers such as policy fragmentation and funding gaps. It recommends a national roadmap, strengthened financial instruments like green bonds, and embedding circular criteria in public procurement.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では循環経済政策（プラスチック資源循環促進法など）が進むが、本論文のエコシステムアプローチや国際ベンチマークは、日本のCE戦略の強化に示唆を与える。特に、政策の一貫性やデータ調和の欠如が指摘されており、日本のGX実践におけるCE統合の参考となる。
In the global GX context
While circular economy is adjacent to GX, this paper's ecosystem approach and cross-country benchmarking offer insights for global CE policy integration. The emphasis on harmonized indicators and inclusive governance resonates with ISSB and CSRD frameworks that require systemic sustainability reporting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comparative framework for CE implementation and barriers, useful for scholars studying CE transitions in developing economies.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights practical initiatives and financing mechanisms (green bonds, blended finance) that corporate sustainability teams can explore.
🏛政策担当者:Offers a roadmap for national CE policy, including binding targets and extended producer responsibility, relevant for regulators designing CE strategies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Background: This study examines Indonesia’s adoption of circular-economy (CE) principles through an ecosystem lens and benchmarks national progress against leading global models. Method: Drawing on a review of academic articles, policy reports, and case studies, nine Indonesian initiatives are cataloged, ranging from Mycotech Lab’s biowaste valorization to PT Pertamina’s circular-carbon programs and community-driven collaborations like LTKL. Findings: These examples demonstrate localized successes in waste reduction, resource recirculation, and stakeholder engagement, yet they remain largely sector-specific and pilot-scale. In contrast, regions such as the European Union, China, and Finland operate under comprehensive, economy-wide frameworks with binding targets, dedicated financing mechanisms, and mandatory extended-producer-responsibility schemes. Quantitative metrics from Indonesian projects show material savings (e.g., 2,200 tons of plastic avoided by BulkSource) and emission reductions (e.g., 352,000 ton CO₂eq cut by Pertamina). Meanwhile, qualitative analysis highlights enabling factors, including multi-stakeholder collaboration and eco-innovation; as well as persistent barriers such as policy fragmentation, limited funding, and uneven data availability. A cross-case synthesis shows the absence of harmonized indicators and national coordination, which hinders scaling and aggregation of sectoral gains into systemic impact. Conclusion: It is concluded that Indonesia’s transition to a mature CE requires the establishment of a coherent national roadmap with clear targets, robust monitoring, and inclusive governance structures that integrate informal and rural actors. Strengthening financial instruments, such as green bonds and blended-finance vehicles, and embedding circular criteria in public procurement will be critical to mobilizing investment and promoting widespread adoption. By aligning policy, finance, and community engagement, progress toward systemic circularity can be accelerated. Novelty/Originality of this Article: This study uniquely integrates ecosystem-based evaluation with quantitative and policy-level benchmarking to propose a strategic roadmap for Indonesia’s systemic CE transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.61511/seesdgj.v3i1.2025.1887first seen 2026-05-05 19:07:43
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。