← 論文一覧に戻る

Net sıfır karbon bina hedeflerine ulaşmak için şebeke ve mikro üretim yöntemlerinin yaşam döngü etkileri

ネットゼロカーボン建築目標を達成するためのグリッドおよびマイクロ発電方法のライフサイクル影響 (AI 翻訳)

Enes İnceöz

OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)ジャーナル2026-06-29#炭素会計経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: construction
原典: https://hdl.handle.net/11511/119710

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、建物の運用炭素排出量を正確に評価するために、電力インフラの体化排出量を含むライフサイクルアセスメントを実施。トルコ・アンカラのオフィスビルを対象に、グリッド電力の真の炭素強度を定量化し、屋上・ファサードへの太陽光パネル導入によるコスト削減効果を評価。ネットゼロエネルギービルシナリオでは、ベースライン比80.75%削減、炭素削減コストはマイナスとなり、太陽光パネルが経済的にも有効であることを示した。

English

This paper quantifies true operational carbon emissions of a building by including embodied emissions of electricity infrastructure through life cycle assessment. Using a case office building in Ankara, Turkey, it evaluates grid electricity's full carbon intensity and the cost reduction potential of solar panels on roof and façade. The net-zero energy building scenario achieves an 80.75% reduction in carbon footprint with a negative abatement cost (-$207.90/tCO2eq), demonstrating financial savings alongside emission reductions.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でもネットゼロ建築目標が掲げられる中、電力インフラの体化排出を含めた建物カーボンフットプリント評価手法は、SSBJ基準や有報におけるGHG排出量把握の精緻化に寄与する可能性がある。

In the global GX context

Globally, this study addresses a gap in building carbon accounting by including lifecycle emissions of energy infrastructure, which is often overlooked in TCFD/ISSB frameworks. The methodology provides a more accurate benchmark for net-zero building targets and can inform transition finance assessments.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive LCA methodology for building operational emissions including infrastructure, useful for carbon accounting research.

🏢実務担当者:Demonstrates the carbon and cost benefits of on-site solar PV for buildings, aiding investment decisions in net-zero design.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need to include infrastructure emissions in building codes and net-zero targets for accurate decarbonization tracking.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Decarbonizing the built environment requires an accurate and comprehensive accounting of operational carbon emissions. Türkiye's 2043 net-zero building target underscores this urgency, yet current assessment metrics often fall short. Quantifying buildings’ operational emissions cannot rely solely on on-site energy combustion; it must also account for the embodied emissions of the energy infrastructure supplying buildings. The true carbon intensity of electricity encompasses both generation related emissions and lifecycle emissions of the infrastructure system. Despite this, infrastructure emissions remain largely overlooked in Türkiye, leading to an underestimation of the sector's decarbonization trajectory. Therefore, this study quantifies the true operational carbon emissions of a case office building in Ankara by accounting for the total embodied and operational emissions of its grid electricity supply, including generation emissions, power losses, and the embodied emissions of the transmission and distribution network, through an extensive Life Cycle Assessment. Furthermore, it evaluates the cost reduction potential of solar panels installed on the roof and façade across four scenarios, including a “net-zero energy building scenario” and a “business-as-usual” scenario. The "business-as-usual" scenario, without solar panels, yields a carbon footprint of 315.45 tCO2eq. The "net-zero energy building" scenario results in 60.69 tCO2eq, an 80.75% reduction from the baseline, with a carbon abatement cost of -207.90 $/tCO2eq, indicating that solar panels provide financial savings while reducing operational carbon emissions. The results serve as a benchmark for understanding the impact of net-zero energy buildings, accounting for the environmental impact of electricity across every phase of its delivery to end users.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。