Source-Load Coordinated Low-Carbon Planning Considering Carbon Emission Flow and Green Certificate-Carbon Trading Mechanisms
炭素排出フローとグリーン証明書・炭素取引メカニズムを考慮した電源・負荷協調の低炭素計画 (AI 翻訳)
TANG Xujian, ZHANG Yao, LIAO Longzhu, SUN Shichao
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、炭素排出フロー理論に基づくノード単位の炭素ポテンシャルを導入し、グリーン証明書取引と炭素取引を統合した電源・負荷協調の二段階低炭素計画モデルを提案する。需要側の時間・空間的負荷シフトを誘導し、システム全体の脱炭素と経済性を両立する。ケーススタディでは年間CO2排出量7.40%削減、総コスト1.13%削減、再生可能エネルギー導入率51.45%→54.98%を達成。
English
This paper proposes a bi-level source-load coordinated low-carbon planning model integrating carbon emission flow, green certificate trading, and carbon trading. Nodal carbon potential signals guide temporal and spatial demand response. Case study results show 7.40% annual carbon emission reduction, 1.13% total cost reduction, and renewable penetration rising from 51.45% to 54.98%.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではGX-ETSやFIP制度など市場シグナルと電源投資の連動が論点となる中、系統単位の炭素責任配分と需要側シグナルの設計はSSBJ開示やScope2排出原単位の精緻化にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, the paper offers a practical framework for integrating carbon markets with power system planning, refining Scope 2 accounting via nodal carbon potential, and aligning demand response with decarbonization—relevant to ISSB-aligned disclosure and energy transition investment signals.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Useful for advancing power system planning models that couple carbon pricing, emission flow accounting, and demand-side flexibility.
🏢実務担当者:Electric utilities and grid planners can adopt the source-load coordination approach to optimize generation investments and carbon compliance costs.
🏛政策担当者:Insights for designing green certificate and carbon trading mechanisms that send coherent locational and temporal signals to both generators and consumers.
📄 Abstract(原文)
[Objective] In the context of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals and the ongoing construction of new-type power systems, the high penetration of renewable energy and stringent emission reduction requirements have revealed several critical deficiencies in conventional power system planning, including coarse-grained carbon accounting, poor coordination between market mechanisms and planning decisions, and insufficient low-carbon incentives on the demand side. To achieve coordinated low-carbon optimization across source-grid-load dimensions, it is imperative to develop a planning approach that can characterize nodal carbon responsibility while incorporating both green certificate trading and carbon emission trading mechanisms. Taking a regional transmission system as the research subject, this paper proposes a source-load coordinated bi-level low-carbon planning model that integrates carbon emission flow with the dual market mechanisms of green certificate trading and carbon trading. [Methods] From the perspective of the system planner, the upper-level model incorporates annualized investment costs, supply-side operating costs, and the net trading terms of carbon allowances and green certificates into a unified objective function, thereby coordinating generation expansion decisions with market signals. On the basis of carbon emission flow theory, a nodal carbon potential model is developed to characterize the spatiotemporal distribution of carbon responsibility across the network. The lower-level model formulates a differentiated demand response scheme driven by nodal carbon potential signals, which guides load shifting in both temporal and spatial dimensions toward low-carbon patterns; the source-load coupling is then solved through iterative coordination between the two levels. [Results] Case study results demonstrate that, compared with a conventional planning scheme, the proposed coordinated optimization reduces annual carbon emissions by 7.40% and total annual system cost by 1.13%, while increasing the renewable penetration rate from 51.45% to 54.98%. Under the guidance of nodal carbon potential, load is reduced during high-carbon periods and shifted to low-carbon periods, resulting in a 5.11% decrease in the demand-side carbon response assessment cost. [Conclusions] Green certificate trading and carbon emission trading reshape the power supply structure through investment incentives and emission constraints, respectively, whereas nodal carbon potential signals enable refined allocation of carbon responsibility from the system level to individual nodes. In conjunction with demand response, these mechanisms constitute a synergistic framework that effectively enhances system decarbonization performance while maintaining economic efficiency.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doaj.org/article/bf84f4fa88344d9e9d1954cc9c885999first seen 2026-08-02 05:18:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。