← 論文一覧に戻る

カナダの国家的関心プロジェクトの台頭：憲法上の正当性、連邦権限、比較司法的調停

THE RISE OF CANADIAN NATIONAL INTEREST PROJECTS: CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY, FEDERAL POWERS, AND COMPARATIVE JUDICIAL MEDIATION (原題)

Dar, Munir

Zenodoプレプリント2026-08-25#政策
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22102727
原典: https://zenodo.org/records/22102727
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、気候変動対策やエネルギー転換を含むカナダの国家的関心プロジェクトにおける連邦と州の権限配分を憲法学的に分析する。最高裁判決（温室効果ガス価格設定法参照、影響評価法参照）を検討し、司法が連邦権限の境界を画定する役割を強調。オーストラリア等との比較から、カナダの司法主導モデルの特徴を明らかにする。

English

This paper analyzes the constitutional division of powers for Canadian national interest projects, including climate change and energy transition initiatives. It examines Supreme Court rulings (GHG Pricing Act, Impact Assessment Act) and argues that judicial mediation increasingly defines federal authority. Comparative insights from Australia, Germany, India, and South Africa highlight Canada's judicially driven model.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX政策（GX推進法、温暖化対策計画）における国と地方の役割分担や、政策の法的枠組みを考える上で示唆に富む。特に、気候政策を巡る司法判断が政策実行に与える影響は、日本の今後の訴訟リスクや制度設計に参考になる。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global GX scholarship by examining how constitutional frameworks shape climate and energy policy implementation. It offers comparative insights for federal systems (e.g., EU, US) on balancing central authority with subnational autonomy, relevant to ISSB/CSRD implementation and transition finance governance.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a structured framework for evaluating national interest projects, useful for comparative federalism and climate governance research.

🏢実務担当者:Limited direct applicability, but offers insight into legal risks and regulatory stability for large-scale energy projects in Canada.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the role of courts in defining federal powers, informing policy design to withstand constitutional challenges.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Dar, M. A. (2026). The Rise of Canadian National Interest Projects: Constitutional Validity, Federal Powers, and Comparative Judicial Mediation. Canadian Legal Research Journal (CLRJ). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22102727 ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1445-4176 Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=7qq7WEkAAAAJ&hl=en ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Munir-Dar-3?ev=hdr_xprf Web of Science Researcher ID: OHV‑2983‑2025 Academia.edu: https://yorku.academia.edu/munirdar CLRJ Affiliation https://www.clrj.ca DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17526038 Annotation: In this 2026 scholarly work, Munir Dar provides a comprehensive constitutional analysis of the rise of national interest projects in Canada large-scale federal initiatives addressing climate change, interprovincial infrastructure, environmental protection, and energy transition. Dar argues that these projects occupy a constitutionally sensitive space where federal authority must be carefully balanced against provincial autonomy under the Constitution Act, 1867. The paper examines how the Supreme Court of Canada interprets federal powers through doctrines such as Peace, Order, and Good Government (POGG), the national concern doctrine, cooperative federalism, and the division of powers. Using doctrinal legal analysis and case-law review, including Crown Zellerbach (1988), Reference re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (2021 SCC 11), and Reference re Impact Assessment Act (2023 SCC 23), Dar, Munir demonstrates that national interest projects increasingly rely on judicial mediation rather than political negotiation. The paper further incorporates comparative insights from Australia, Germany, India, and South Africa, showing that Canada’s model is uniquely judicially driven, with courts playing a central role in defining the constitutional boundaries of federal national interest powers. This work contributes significantly to Canadian constitutional scholarship by proposing a structured framework for evaluating national interest projects that ensures regulatory effectiveness while respecting provincial jurisdiction. It is particularly valuable for researchers in constitutional law, federalism, regulatory governance, and public policy. Keywords: National interest; federal powers; POGG; national concern doctrine; cooperative federalism; constitutional law; regulatory governance; Canada.  

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。