Different Conditions, Yet Similar Outcomes: How Interaction Between Policy Areas Enabled Carbon Tax Adoption in Sweden and Mexico
異なる条件、しかし類似した結果：政策領域間の相互作用がスウェーデンとメキシコの炭素税導入を可能にした方法 (AI 翻訳)
Jakob Skovgaard, Åsa Knaggård, Roger Hildingsson, Sofía Sacks Ferrari
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
スウェーデンとメキシコの炭素税導入プロセスを比較し、両国の違いにもかかわらず、アイデアの変化と財政改革による機会の窓が炭素税導入を可能にした共通点を明らかにした。経済と環境のアクター連携の重要性を示す。
English
This paper compares carbon tax adoption in Sweden and Mexico, finding that despite different contexts, similar factors such as ideational change and fiscal reform windows enabled adoption. It highlights the importance of coalition-building between economic and environmental actors.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも炭素税や排出量取引の導入議論が進む中、海外事例の成功要因を分析した本稿は、政策設計や利害調整の参考となる。特に、異なる条件でも共通する促進要因を示した点は示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
This comparative study offers global insights into carbon tax adoption processes, relevant for countries like Japan considering carbon pricing. The emphasis on cross-sectoral coalition-building and policy windows is valuable for climate policy design worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Carbon tax adoption mechanisms and the role of ideational change and fiscal reform are clearly analyzed, providing a framework for further comparative studies.
🏛政策担当者:Lessons on how to leverage fiscal reforms and build coalitions between economic and environmental ministries can inform national carbon pricing strategies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT The interest in putting a price on carbon emissions is increasing in pace with the urgency of climate change. In this article we compare the adoption of one such policy instrument, carbon taxation, in the cases of Sweden and Mexico. We use a theoretical framework that focuses on economic and environmental factors influencing the policy process via distinct policy areas, as well as the mechanisms these factors operate through and their impact on agency. Despite the differences between the countries, the adoption of carbon taxes in these two cases was shaped by surprisingly similar factors. In both cases ideational change allowed for framing carbon taxes in environmental and economic terms, which eased coalition‐building between economic and environmental actors once broad fiscal reforms changed power dynamics and opened windows of opportunity for policy adoption. These findings contain lessons regarding interacting factors shaping policy adoption, including the critical importance of actors exploiting synergies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70075first seen 2026-05-05 08:11:47
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。