人工知能と持続可能なオペレーション:医療機器製造業のためのフレームワーク
Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Operations: A Framework for Healthcare Equipment Manufacturing Industry (原題)
Manish Tiwari, Deepti Wadera
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
医療機器製造における持続可能なオペレーションを、AIを運用能力の集合として概念化した系統的レビュー。予知保全、デジタルツイン、品質保証、循環設計などがダウンタイム・エネルギー損失・廃棄を削減しうる一方、AI自体の計算需要やデータガバナンス負担が新たな持続可能性問題を生むと指摘。58件の文献から、規制の厳しい製造環境でのAIの統治・検証・スケールが主要な研究ギャップだと結論づける。
English
A PRISMA-informed systematic review conceptualizing AI as operational capabilities for sustainable healthcare equipment manufacturing. It finds AI-enabled predictive maintenance, digital twins, quality systems and circular design can cut downtime, energy loss and scrap, while AI's own computing demand and data governance create new sustainability burdens. The key gap is how to govern, validate and scale AI in tightly regulated manufacturing without shifting environmental and ethical burdens elsewhere.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は医療機器・精密製造の輸出大国であり、SSBJや有報でのScope3・サプライチェーン開示が進む中、AIによる調達・在庫・品質管理の最適化は開示データの精度向上に直結する。規制産業でのAIガバナンスは、日本企業のGXとDXの統合課題として実務的示唆が大きい。
In the global GX context
While not a disclosure paper, it speaks to the operational backbone behind Scope 3 and supply-chain disclosures under ISSB/CSRD: AI-driven traceability, procurement and circular design in regulated manufacturing. It also flags the double-edged nature of AI adoption, relevant to emerging debates on AI's own energy and governance footprint in corporate climate strategy.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:AIを規制産業の持続可能なオペレーションに適用する際の統治・検証・スケールの研究ギャップを整理する枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:医療機器・精密製造のサステナビリティ担当は、予知保全やデジタルツインによる廃棄・エネルギー削減と、AI導入に伴うデータガバナンス負担の両面を検討できる。
🏛政策担当者:規制産業におけるAI導入の環境・倫理的負荷の移転を防ぐため、検証・ガバナンス要件の設計に示唆を与える。
📄 Abstract(原文)
Healthcare equipment manufacturing faces the dual imperative of maintaining product safety, regulatory compliance and quality while advancing sustainability across the product life cycle. This review conceptualizes artificial intelligence as a set of operational capabilities that can enhance predictive maintenance, process optimization, quality assurance, traceability, demand planning, circular design and life-cycle decision-making. At the same time, the paper shows that AI can create new sustainability problems through high computing demand, data governance burdens and regulatory complexity if adoption is poorly designed (Katirai, 2024; Rowan, 2024; Bignami et al., 2025). [1] The paper uses a PRISMA-informed systematic literature review, structured through SPAR-4-SLR logic and thematic analysis. The final corpus included 58 peer-reviewed publications from 2000 to June 2026, with a strong concentration after 2020, alongside selected policy and sector documents for contextual support on regulation and net-zero supply chains (Page et al., 2021; Paul et al., 2021). [2] The literature reveals six consistent findings: AI-enabled predictive maintenance reduces downtime, energy loss and unnecessary component replacement; digital twins enhance process visibility, design iteration and resource efficiency; AI-based quality systems support defect, scrap and compliance-risk reduction; circular economy models for medical devices are technically feasible but operationally underdeveloped; healthcare supply chains remain a major sustainability hotspot, highlighting the value of AI-enabled procurement and inventory management; and sector-specific evidence remains fragmented, with limited plant-level empirical research focused directly on healthcare equipment manufacturing. The main research gap, therefore, is not whether AI can support sustainable operations, but how to govern, validate and scale it in tightly regulated manufacturing environments without shifting environmental and ethical burdens elsewhere. [3]
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://asiaentrepreneurshipjournal.com/index.php/jaes/article/download/646/476first seen 2026-09-16 05:17:00 · last seen 2026-09-22 05:18:29
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。