エネルギー移行における政策設計ギャップの橋渡し：SDGs連動エネルギーガバナンスの加速要因としてのデジタルリーダーシップと変革的イノベーション政策
Bridging policy design gaps in energy transitions: digital leadership and transformative innovation policy as accelerators for SDG-linked energy governance (原題)
Susy Harjanti, Rano Kartono Rahim, Mohammad Hamsal, Sevenpri Candra, Willy Gunadi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、SDGsに関連するエネルギー移行における政策設計のギャップに対処するため、デジタルリーダーシップ（DL）と変革的イノベーション政策（TIP）がエネルギー移行研究にどのように統合・位置づけられているかを、2015年から2025年の283件の文献の計量書誌学分析により明らかにする。結果、政策ミックスや持続可能性移行が支配的である一方、DLとTIPの統合は弱いことを示し、インドネシアのB40バイオディーゼル計画を事例に、政策実施が概念統合に先行する可能性を示唆する。
English
This bibliometric study examines how digital leadership (DL) and transformative innovation policy (TIP) are integrated in energy transition research, analyzing 283 articles (2015-2025). Findings show policy mix and sustainability transitions dominate, while DL and TIP remain weakly integrated. Using Indonesia's B40 biodiesel program as an illustration, it suggests policy implementation may outpace conceptual alignment, offering a practice-based reflection for adaptive energy governance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、GX推進法やエネルギー基本計画の改定など、エネルギー移行政策が進む中で、デジタル技術とイノベーション政策の統合は重要度を増している。本稿の計量書誌学的手法は、日本のエネルギー政策研究の構造を俯瞰する参考となるが、具体的な日本への示唆は限定的。
In the global GX context
Globally, this study contributes to understanding policy design gaps in energy transitions, relevant to SDG-oriented governance. It highlights the limited integration of digital leadership and transformative innovation policy, offering a bibliometric lens for researchers and policymakers. The Indonesian case adds a developing-country perspective, but the study is more academic than directly actionable for corporate or regulatory practice.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a bibliometric map of energy transition research, highlighting gaps in DL and TIP integration for future research directions.
🏛政策担当者:Offers insights into policy design gaps and the potential role of digital leadership in energy governance, relevant for SDG-aligned policy planning.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Purpose Motivated by persistent policy design gaps in SDG-linked energy transitions, this study aims to examine how digital leadership (DL) and transformative innovation policy (TIP) are integrated, positioned or marginalized within global energy transition scholarship. It also considers how their potential alignment may inform future research on adaptive energy governance. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts a bibliometric approach as the research questions focus on field-level knowledge structures, conceptual integration, thematic evolution and collaboration patterns. The analysis uses 283 Scopus- and Web of Science-indexed articles published between 2015 and 2025. Keyword co-occurrence, thematic evolution and author-country collaboration analyses are used to map the intellectual structures and relational patterns linking DL, TIP, innovation governance and sustainable energy transition scholarship. Findings The analysis shows that policy mix, sustainability transitions and technology adoption dominate global energy transition research, while DL and TIP remain weakly integrated in policy-oriented studies. Indonesia’s B40 biodiesel program is used as a contextual illustration of how policy implementation may advance faster than explicit DL−TIP alignment. This offers a practice-based reflection rather than empirical validation of the bibliometric patterns. Research limitations/implications This study relies on bibliometric evidence indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. The English language and document-type restrictions may underrepresent regional or practice-oriented policy insights. Future research should incorporate regional databases and combine bibliometric findings with qualitative policy analysis. Further studies may also examine how DL−TIP-informed interventions are designed, implemented and assessed in specific policy settings. Originality/value This study contributes by providing bibliometric evidence of the limited integration between DL and TIP in energy transition scholarship. Rather than proposing a fully developed governance framework, the study positions DL−TIP alignment as an emerging conceptual lens for understanding thematic fragmentation and informing future research on adaptive, SDG-oriented energy governance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1108/ijesm-07-2025-0065first seen 2026-08-30 04:32:10
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。