炭素取引参加への土地関連民間セクターの意向を解き明かす：計画行動理論からの洞察
Unlocking Land‐Based Private Sector Intentions for Carbon Trading Participation: Insights From the Theory of Planned Behaviour (原題)
Iis Alviya, Harsha Sarvaiya, Md Sayed Iftekhar, Tapan Sarker
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
インドネシアの土地関連企業18社の幹部インタビューを通じ、炭素取引への参加意向が経済的動機と制度的圧力にどう左右されるかを計画行動理論（TPB）で分析。規制の曖昧さ、高い取引コスト、組織能力の不足が参加意欲を低下させる主因であることを示した。TPBを組織レベルに拡張し、炭素市場が実質的・選択的・象徴的関与を促す条件を提示する。
English
Drawing on 18 interviews with senior executives of Indonesian land-based firms, this study applies the Theory of Planned Behaviour to examine intentions to participate in carbon trading. Regulatory ambiguity, high transaction costs, and limited capabilities reduce perceived behavioural control and weaken engagement. It extends TPB to the organisational level and identifies conditions for substantive, selective, or symbolic market participation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
インドネシアの炭素市場は日本企業のGX投資先・クレジット調達先として注目される。制度的不確実性が民間参加を阻む構造は、日本のJCM（二国間クレジット）案件形成やアジア域内の炭素市場連携を検討する実務家にとって示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
As Article 6 and voluntary carbon markets expand, this paper illuminates why firm-level participation lags in emerging economies. It informs global disclosure and transition-finance debates on the credibility of corporate carbon-market engagement and the institutional preconditions for substantive participation.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:TPBを組織レベルに拡張し、制度理論と正統性理論を統合した炭素市場参加意向の分析枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:新興国での炭素クレジット調達やGX投資を検討する際、現地企業の参加障壁（規制曖昧性・取引コスト・能力不足）を理解する材料になる。
🏛政策担当者:炭素市場の制度設計において、規制の明確化と取引コスト低減が民間参加を促す鍵であることを示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT Carbon trading is increasingly recognised as a market‐based instrument for climate mitigation with important strategic implications for firms' competitiveness, capability development and legitimacy within global value chains. However, firm‐level engagement remains uneven, particularly in emerging economies. This study examines how land‐based firms in Indonesia form strategic intentions to participate in carbon trading under conditions of institutional uncertainty. Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and integrating institutional and legitimacy perspectives, the study reconceptualises intention as a strategic orientation shaped by organisational and institutional contexts rather than as a direct predictor of implementation. Data were collected through 18 semi‐structured interviews conducted between December 2022 and February 2023 with senior executives from land‐based firms in Indonesia. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis supported by NVivo. The findings indicate that senior executives generally described organisational attitudes towards carbon trading as being strongly influenced by economic considerations, while institutional pressures shaped strategic decision‐making. Regulatory ambiguity, high transaction costs and limited organisational capabilities emerged as key constraints on perceived behavioural controls, thereby reducing firms' intention to engage. By integrating TPB with institutional and legitimacy perspectives, this study extends the TPB at the organisational level and offers insights into the conditions under which carbon markets may encourage substantive, selective or symbolic forms of engagement.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70436first seen 2026-10-28 04:51:35 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:47:02
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。