イランのエネルギー移行政策の評価：エネルギートライアングル枠組みによる電力部門の分析
Evaluating Iran's energy transition policy: An analysis of electricity sector through the energy triangle framework (原題)
Ashraf Sadat Pasandideh, Ghazaleh Ezaan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、エネルギートライアングル枠組み（経済発展、エネルギー安全保障・アクセス、持続可能性）を用いてイランの電力・エネルギー政策を分析し、政策文書のテーマ分析とエネルギーバランスシートの検討を通じて、政策実施の非効率性と戦略計画と実行の乖離を明らかにした。環境持続可能性が軽視され、ガバナンスと制度の改革が必要であると結論付けている。
English
This study analyzes Iran's electricity and energy policies using the energy triangle framework (economic development, energy security/access, sustainability). Through thematic analysis of policy documents and energy balance sheets, it reveals significant imbalances, with environmental sustainability marginalized and systematic inefficiencies in policy implementation. It recommends fundamental reforms in governance and institutional arrangements, offering a replicable methodological approach for evaluating implementation gaps in fossil-fuel-dependent economies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、エネルギー政策の統合的評価や制度設計の参考になる。特に、政策の実施ギャップを定量的に評価する方法は、日本のGX推進における政策効果測定に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a replicable framework for assessing energy transition policy implementation gaps, relevant for global scholars and policymakers in fossil-fuel-dependent economies. It bridges socio-technical transition theory with the energy triangle framework, offering insights into governance and institutional barriers that can inform similar evaluations in other contexts.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー移行政策の評価枠組みと実施ギャップ分析の方法論を提供。
🏢実務担当者:政策実施の非効率性を理解し、自社のエネルギー戦略におけるギャップ評価に応用可能。
🏛政策担当者:エネルギー政策の統合的評価と制度改革の必要性を示す示唆を提供。
📄 Abstract（原文）
In the context of sustainable development, sustainable energy has emerged as a transformative area within the global energy system. This study systematically analyzes Iran's electricity and energy policies through the energy triangle framework, which includes economic development, energy security and accessibility, and sustainability. By examining policy documents and employing thematic analysis, the research evaluates policy effectiveness, coordination mechanisms, and balance among these dimensions. The investigation reveals significant imbalances in Iran's energy policy landscape, with a disproportionate focus on economic growth and energy access, while environmental sustainability remains marginalized. It identifies deficiencies in horizontal coordination among governmental bodies and vertical integration of policy processes. Despite numerous initiatives promoting sustainable energy development, the electricity sector continues to face challenges in achieving its objectives. Findings indicate systematic inefficiencies in policy implementation, highlighting the disconnect between strategic planning and operational execution. By examining energy balance sheets, the research quantifies the gap between policy aspirations and actual achievements. The study concludes that Iran's energy sector needs fundamental transformation through comprehensive reforms in governance, regulatory frameworks, and institutional arrangements. Recommendations emphasize adopting socio-technical transition frameworks for future development and highlighting areas requiring immediate intervention. This research provides valuable insights for policymakers in developing nations navigating sustainable energy development complexities. This study contributes to the literature by bridging socio-technical transition theory with the energy triangle framework, providing a granular analysis of institutional and governance barriers that impede energy transition in a fossil-fuel-dependent economy. Unlike descriptive policy reviews, this research offers a replicable methodological approach for evaluating implementation gaps in similar contexts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2026.100267first seen 2026-08-27 04:55:33
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。