ガーディアン紙における気候変動報道、2010–2025年
Climate Change Coverage in The Guardian, 2010–2025 (原題)
Fabian Dablander, Simon Wimmer, Jonas M B Haslbeck
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
大手紙ガーディアンの気候変動報道18,785件をLLMベースの手法で分析した初の包括的評価。2018年以降報道量が急増し高止まりする一方、原因・緩和は化石燃料と再エネに偏り、農業・過剰消費・炭素不平等・経済成長への言及は乏しい。適応は原因・影響・緩和より著しく少ない。より包括的な報道の余地を示す。
English
First comprehensive LLM-based assessment of The Guardian's climate coverage (N=18,785 articles, 2010–2025). Coverage rose sharply after 2018 and stayed elevated; causes and mitigation are dominated by fossil fuels and renewables, while agriculture, overconsumption, carbon inequality and growth are rarely mentioned. Adaptation receives far less attention than causes, impacts and mitigation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
気候報道の量的・質的偏りを可視化する手法は、日本企業の統合報告書や有報における気候関連記述のトーン・網羅性分析に応用可能。SSBJ・TCFD開示の質的評価や、国内メディア・投資家向け情報発信の設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Demonstrates an LLM methodology for auditing climate narrative coverage that transfers directly to disclosure scholarship — assessing completeness and framing bias in TCFD/ISSB/CSRD reports, and understanding how media salience shapes the corporate and policy disclosure agenda.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:LLMによる大規模テキスト分類を気候ナラティブ分析に適用する検証済み手法を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:自社の気候開示や広報が扱うテーマの偏りを点検するベンチマークとして使える。
🏛政策担当者:適応や炭素不平等など報道・議論が薄い領域への政策的働きかけの必要性を示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Leading news outlets play a central role in shaping how political leaders and the public understand the causes, impacts, and solutions to climate change. Here, we provide the first comprehensive assessment of how The Guardian, a globally influential newspaper widely recognized for high-quality climate journalism, has reported on climate change between 2010 and 2025. We applied a validated methodology based on large language models to analyze N = 18,785 articles and evaluate to what extent reporting covers scientifically grounded causes, impacts, mitigation strategies, and adaptation measures. We find that climate coverage increased markedly after 2018 and has remained structurally elevated relative to the preceding decade. Coverage of causes and mitigation is dominated by fossil fuels and renewable energy, whereas agriculture, overconsumption, carbon inequality, and economic growth are mentioned far less frequently. Aspects related to adaptation receive considerably less attention than aspects related to causes, impacts, and mitigation. Our findings highlight opportunities for more comprehensive coverage that better reflects full range of societal transformations needed to address climate change.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/hy6re_v2first seen 2026-10-06 04:59:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。