国際環境法：地球規模の気候変動に直面する国家の義務
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW: STATE OBLIGATIONS IN THE FACE OF GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE (原題)
Gabriel Del Zamar Moreira de Oliveira
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ストックホルム会議（1972年）からパリ協定（2015年）までの国際環境法の展開を、予防原則・防止原則・共通だが差異ある責任の観点から分析した法学研究。条約上の集合的責任の認識は拡大したものの、先進国と途上国の責任の非対称性をめぐる緊張が残ると指摘。義務の実効性は形式的批准よりも国内実施能力・国際協力・気候正義の組込みに依存すると結論づける。
English
A legal-doctrinal study tracing international environmental law from the 1972 Stockholm Conference to the 2015 Paris Agreement, focusing on precaution, prevention, and common but differentiated responsibilities. It finds that collective climate responsibility is increasingly recognized in treaties, yet tensions over asymmetric obligations between developed and developing states persist. Effectiveness depends less on formal ratification than on domestic implementation capacity, cooperation, and climate justice.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では気候変動対策推進法や地球温暖化対策計画の国際法的根拠を理解する基礎資料になり、SSBJ開示の背景にある国家的義務の枠組みを法的に位置づける視点を提供する。
In the global GX context
Frames the treaty architecture (UNFCCC, Paris Agreement, CBDR) that underpins ISSB/TCFD disclosure expectations and transition-finance policy debates, useful for situating corporate disclosure duties within state-level legal obligations.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:国際環境法における国家義務の実効性と気候正義の論点を整理する枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:自社の気候開示・削減目標が依拠する国際条約の義務構造とCBDR原則の背景理解に役立つ。
🏛政策担当者:国内気候法制の設計において、実施能力と国際協力の重要性を示す法的論点を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change represents one of the greatest contemporary challenges facing the international community, requiring coordinated responses that transcend national borders. International Environmental Law emerges as the principal legal instrument for regulation and cooperation, establishing obligations for States in confronting this global crisis. This article aims to analyze the nature and effectiveness of these obligations, considering both the historical evolution of international treaties and current dilemmas related to sovereignty and cooperation among countries. The temporal scope extends from the Stockholm Conference (1972) to the most recent developments arising from the Paris Agreement (2015), with particular emphasis on the principles of precaution, prevention, and common but differentiated responsibilities. Methodologically, the study is based on qualitative, bibliographic, and documentary research, with emphasis on legal-dogmatic interpretation and the critical analysis of international treaties and reports. The results indicate that, although international legal instruments have expanded recognition of collective responsibility for climate-change mitigation and adaptation, tensions persist concerning the asymmetry of responsibilities between developed and developing countries. It is concluded that the effectiveness of environmental obligations depends not only on formal adherence to treaties but, above all, on the capacity for practical implementation, effective international cooperation, and the incorporation of climate justice principles.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.52832/jesh.v5i1.790first seen 2026-11-13 04:55:56
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。