持続可能で手頃なモジュール式住宅における循環性と再利用準備性:系統的スコーピングレビュー
Circularity and Reuse Readiness in Sustainable and Affordable Modular Housing: A Systematic Scoping Review (原題)
(著者不明)
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
2016〜2026年の文献283件から49件を抽出し、モジュール式住宅の循環経済戦略と再利用準備性を0R–10R枠組みで整理した。LCA・炭素排出・廃棄物削減に偏り、refuse/rethink/reduce/redesignなど上流戦略や修理・再製造・社会的価値の検討が不足している。プレハブ化だけでは循環性は担保されず、解体容易な接合・標準化・素材トレーサビリティ・逆物流が鍵となる。BIM・デジタルツイン・マテリアルパスポートを統合した「Integrated Digital Circular Modular Ecosystem」を提案する。
English
A scoping review of 49 studies (2016–2026) maps circular economy strategies and reuse readiness in modular affordable housing using the 0R–10R framework. Literature concentrates on LCA, carbon, waste, reuse and recycling, while early-stage strategies (refuse, rethink, reduce, redesign) and repair/refurbishment/remanufacturing remain under-examined. Prefabrication alone does not ensure circularity; demountable connections, standardization, traceability and reverse logistics are decisive. The authors propose an Integrated Digital Circular Modular Ecosystem linking circular design, material passports, BIM/digital twins and circular marketplaces.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
建設業のScope 3・ embodied carbon 開示が進む日本では、建材の再利用性・マテリアルパスポートはSSBJや有報のサプライチェーン開示と接続しうる。住宅・建設セクターの循環調達や長期資産価値評価に関心のある実務者に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Speaks to the embodied-carbon and circularity dimension of ISSB/CSRD-aligned disclosure, where construction supply chains are a major Scope 3 hotspot. The digital material passport and reuse-readiness framing connects to emerging EU circularity and building-lifecycle reporting requirements.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:循環経済戦略の研究ギャップ(上流戦略・修理・再製造)とデジタル循環エコシステムの枠組みを提示する。
🏢実務担当者:モジュール建築の調達・設計段階で再利用準備性とマテリアルパスポートを組み込む際のチェック項目として活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:建設廃棄物削減や循環調達基準の設計において、再利用性評価とデジタルトレーサビリティ要件の根拠となりうる。
📄 Abstract(原文)
The growing demand for sustainable and affordable housing requires construction systems that reduce material consumption, embodied environmental impacts, construction waste, and life-cycle costs while retaining the value of building components across multiple use cycles. This study presents a systematic scoping review and evidence map of circular economy strategies and reuse readiness in modular sustainable and affordable housing. A structured literature search covering publications from 2016 to 2026 identified 283 records, of which 49 studies were included following screening and eligibility assessment. The included studies were coded according to circular economy strategies within the 0R–10R framework, building life-cycle stages, modular technology typologies, sustainability and affordability indicators, and reuse-readiness attributes. The evidence map shows that the literature remains predominantly focused on life-cycle assessment, carbon emissions, waste reduction, reuse, and recycling. In contrast, early-stage circular strategies, including refuse, rethink, reduce, and redesign, as well as repair, refurbishment, remanufacturing, social value, life-cycle affordability, and operational reuse readiness, remain insufficiently examined. The findings further demonstrate that prefabrication or modularity alone does not ensure circularity. High reuse readiness depends on demountable connections, non-destructive disassembly, component standardization, durability, repairability, material traceability, reverse logistics, and credible second-life scenarios. Based on the mapped evidence, this study develops an evidence-informed Integrated Digital Circular Modular Ecosystem pathway that connects circular design, material passports, reuse-readiness assessment, BIM and digital twins, component grading, reverse logistics, circular marketplaces, and life-cycle performance evaluation. By integrating reuse readiness, life-cycle affordability, and digital traceability within a single evidence-informed pathway, the study provides a structured basis for researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders to evaluate and advance modular housing beyond construction efficiency toward long-term circularity and component value retention. As a conceptual synthesis, the pathway requires further validation through expert assessment and application to actual modular housing projects.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16173559first seen 2026-09-12 05:42:01 · last seen 2026-09-21 05:13:10
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。