企業の脱炭素化における先進技術の役割：問題提起的レビューと比較研究アジェンダ
The Role of Advanced Technologies in Corporate Decarbonization: A Problematizing Review and Comparative Research Agenda (原題)
Heidy Montero-Teran, Rudolf R. Sinkovics, Olli Kuivalainen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、製造・物流・エネルギー等の脱炭素化における先進技術の効果が国や制度によって異なる点に着目し、既存研究の前提を批判的に検討する。国際ビジネス比較の視点から、規制環境や市場ダイナミクス、組織規範の影響を明らかにし、将来の研究課題を提示する。
English
This review critically examines assumptions in research on advanced technologies for corporate decarbonization, highlighting how national institutional contexts shape technology effectiveness. Using a problematizing review of 64 articles, it proposes a comparative international business research agenda to uncover why outcomes vary across countries.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業の脱炭素技術導入は、SSBJ開示やサプライチェーン排出量削減の要請が進む中で、技術選択とその効果が制度環境に依存する点は示唆的。日本特有の規制・市場構造を考慮した技術評価の重要性を示す。
In the global GX context
This review contributes to global GX scholarship by emphasizing institutional contexts in technology adoption, complementing ISSB/CSRD disclosure frameworks that assume uniform technology effectiveness. It encourages context-sensitive policy design and cross-country learning.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a critical framework for studying technology-decarbonization links across institutional contexts.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need to assess technology effectiveness within specific regulatory and market environments.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that policy should account for institutional differences when promoting advanced decarbonization technologies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Advanced technologies are widely promoted as tools for decarbonization across sectors such as manufacturing, logistics, and energy. However, evidence of their environmental impact remains mixed, with outcomes varying significantly between settings. This variability highlights the need to understand how national institutional contexts shape the implementation and effectiveness of these technologies. A comparative international business perspective is especially useful in uncovering why the same technology leads to different results between countries, revealing the role of regulatory environments, market dynamics, and organizational norms. This paper uses a problematizing review method to critically examine five types of assumptions found in current research: in-house, root metaphor, paradigm, ideology, and field assumptions. This paper analyzes these assumptions through diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational framings. The data for this review were drawn from a systematic search of the Web of Science and Scopus databases, supplemented by manual searches of high-ranking journals across multiple disciplines, resulting in a final sample of 64 relevant peer-reviewed articles. Our contribution includes exposing blind spots in existing literature, proposing a future research agenda, and encouraging a more context-sensitive, institutionally informed approach to technology and decarbonization in comparative international business.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-026-00645-4first seen 2026-08-28 05:40:20 · last seen 2026-09-10 05:30:08
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。