グリーンファイナンスと持続可能な開発のためのクリーンエネルギー移行の経済学
Green Finance and the Economics of Clean Energy Transitions for Sustainable Development (原題)
Eugine Balayo Sifuna, Stephnora Oluchi Adeyanju, Opeyemi Ezekiel Adedokun, Oluwaseyi Joseph Olukayode, James Benjamin Kelechi, Kola Abiola
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
2002〜2025年の査読論文84本を統合した構造的レビュー。グリーンボンドは資本動員に有効だが価格優位性は発行体品質や検証に依存する。再生可能エネルギー展開は調達コストと強く関連し、安定政策・リスク分担・デジタル金融アクセスが投資環境を改善する。炭素価格と再エネ支援は技術革新の方向性に影響し、成長・持続可能性への効果は国・制度・手法により異質である。
English
A structured integrative review of 84 studies (2002-2025) on green finance and clean-energy transitions. Green bonds mobilize capital but pricing advantages depend on issuer quality, verification, and use-of-proceeds credibility. Financing costs strongly shape renewable deployment, especially in developing economies. Stable policy, risk-sharing, financial development, and digital access improve investment conditions, while carbon pricing and renewable support steer technological innovation. Growth and sustainability outcomes remain heterogeneous across contexts.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではGX経済移行債やトランジション・ファイナンス、SSBJ開示と直接連動する論点を整理。グリーンボンドの価格優位性やリスク分担の条件は、国内発行体・投資家の実務判断に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Directly relevant to global transition-finance debates (TCFD/ISSB, green-bond standards, blended finance). It synthesizes evidence on when green finance delivers additionality, informing CSRD/ISSB-aligned capital allocation and policy design in both developed and emerging markets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:グリーンファイナンスの効果に関する既存証拠を6テーマで整理した枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:グリーンボンドや移行金融の調達条件・検証・リスク分担の実務的示唆を得られる。
🏛政策担当者:炭素価格や再エネ支援、リスク分担制度が投資と技術革新に与える影響を政策設計に活かせる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Green finance has become an important mechanism for aligning capital allocation with clean-energy transitions and sustainable development. This structured integrative review synthesizes 84 substantive journal articles published between 2002 and 2025, supported by three methodological sources. Literature was identified through Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar searches conducted in June–July 2026 and synthesized narratively across six themes: green-finance instruments and market pricing; cost of capital and project finance; policy and risk allocation; financial development and digital finance; directed technological change; and sustainable-development outcomes. Of the 84 substantive studies, 44 were published from 2020 onward, representing 52.4% of the evidence base. The review finds that green bonds can mobilize capital and support investment and innovation, although pricing advantages vary with issuer quality, verification, market conditions, and use-of-proceeds credibility. Financing costs are strongly associated with renewable-energy deployment, particularly in developing economies where macroeconomic and project risks can constrain investment. Stable policy, risk-sharing mechanisms, financial development, and digital access are generally associated with improved investment conditions, while carbon pricing and renewable-energy support can influence the direction of technological innovation. Evidence on economic growth and sustainable-development outcomes remains heterogeneous across countries, institutional settings, and empirical methods. Overall, green finance appears most effective when financial additionality is linked to measurable environmental performance, technological learning, broader access to capital, and credible governance. The review provides an integrated framework linking financial instruments, investment conditions, transition outcomes, and sustainable-development effects across diverse national contexts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.51583/ijltemas.2026.150900056first seen 2026-10-14 05:42:36
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。