Analisis Pengaturan Sustainable Finance untuk Mendorong Implementasi Green Finance di Perbankan Indonesia Ditinjau dari Pengaturan Green Finance Negara China sebagai Benchmarking
インドネシアの銀行部門におけるグリーンファイナンス実施促進のためのサステナブルファイナンス規制の分析：中国のグリーンファイナンス規制をベンチマークとして (AI 翻訳)
Annida Putri Nursyabikah, Christian Axl Cannavaro, Hakim Jahran Ibrahim
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、インドネシアの銀行業界におけるグリーンファイナンス規制の現状を分析し、中国の「グリーンクレジットガイドライン」と比較することで、インドネシアが採用すべき4つの側面（統合的規制アプローチ、環境リスク運営の標準化、監督・デューデリジェンスの強化、部門横断的機関調整）を特定した。インドネシアの規制は断片的でグリーンウォッシュのリスクがあるが、中国は階層的で法的拘束力のあるモデルを示している。
English
This study analyzes the state of green finance regulation in Indonesian banking and compares it with China's Green Credit Guidelines. It identifies four aspects for Indonesia to adopt: integrated regulatory approach, standardization of environmental risk operations, strengthening oversight and due diligence, and cross-sectoral institutional coordination. Indonesia's fragmented regulations create greenwashing risks, while China offers a hierarchical, legally binding model.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
In the global GX context
This paper offers a comparative perspective on green finance regulation in emerging economies, highlighting the need for integrated and binding rules to combat greenwashing. It adds to the global literature on financial sector decarbonization policy.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured comparison of green finance regulatory frameworks in Indonesia and China, useful for scholars studying financial regulation and green transition.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights best practices from China that Indonesian banks can reference to strengthen their green finance operations and avoid greenwashing.
🏛政策担当者:Offers concrete policy recommendations (integrated regulation, oversight, coordination) for Indonesian regulators developing comprehensive green finance rules.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Sustainability issues encompassing economic, social and environmental aspects are driving reform in the global financial sector, including in Indonesia. Although the OJK has published a Sustainable Finance Roadmap since 2015, Indonesia does not yet have comprehensive green finance regulations in the banking sector. This study aims to analyse the state of green finance regulation in the Indonesian banking sector and compare it with China’s Green Credit Guidelines, in order to identify relevant aspects for adoption in strengthening national green finance policy. This study employs a normative legal methodology using a legislative and comparative law approach, alongside a qualitative descriptive-analytical analysis of secondary data. The author found that green finance regulations in Indonesia remain fragmented and scattered across various sectoral legal instruments without adequate integration, thereby creating loopholes for greenwashing practices and the adoption of green principles that are merely administrative in nature. The Sustainable Finance Committee mandated by the P2SK Act has not yet been established, exacerbating the lack of coordination between institutions. In contrast, China, through its 2012 Green Credit Guidelines and 2016 Guidelines for Establishing a Green Financial System, demonstrates a regulatory model that is hierarchical, standardised, and legally binding. A comparison of the two identifies four relevant aspects for Indonesia to adopt: an integrated regulatory approach, standardisation of environmental risk operations, strengthening of oversight mechanisms and due diligence, and cross-sectoral institutional coordination. Consequently, Indonesia requires comprehensive, dedicated green finance regulations and must promptly establish the Sustainable Finance Committee as the sole coordinating authority.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v3i2.1625first seen 2026-05-14 23:16:32
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。