Airport management, green logistics, and service quality in the shift to low-carbon civil aviation operations
低炭素航空運航への移行における空港管理、グリーンロジスティクス、およびサービス品質 (AI 翻訳)
Xinxin Ge, Chao Yang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
60空港のパネルデータを用いて、空港管理指標、グリーンロジスティクス指標、サービス品質指標とScope1/2排出強度の関係を分析。管理・物流指標の改善は排出強度低下と関連するが、サービス品質は無相関。空港の脱炭素とサービス向上は別次元であることを示す。
English
Using a panel of 60 international airports from 2015 to 2022, this paper examines associations between airport carbon management, green logistics, service quality indices, and Scope 1&2 emissions intensity. It finds that improvements in management and logistics indices correlate with lower emissions per passenger, while service quality shows no systematic relationship, suggesting decarbonization and passenger service are separate performance dimensions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の空港でもカーボンニュートラル目標が広がる中、本論文は管理指標とグリーンロジスティクスの実践が排出削減に有効であることを示す。サービス品質とのトレードオフがない点は、整備計画や投資判断に有用。
In the global GX context
This study offers empirical evidence on airport decarbonization strategies under global disclosure frameworks like TCFD and ISSB, demonstrating that targeted carbon management and green logistics can reduce emissions without harming service quality, which is relevant for aviation sector transition planning.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence for the dissociation between environmental performance and service quality in airport operations.
🏢実務担当者:Airport operators can focus on carbon management and green logistics to reduce emissions without sacrificing service quality.
🏛政策担当者:Indicates that separate performance metrics for environmental and service quality may be needed for effective aviation decarbonization policy.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Airports face mounting pressure to deliver low-carbon Scope 1 and Scope 2 operations, yet airport carbon management, green logistics, and passenger service quality are usually studied separately. This paper examines how these three dimensions relate to operational emissions intensity using an airport-year panel of 60 international airports observed from 2015 to 2022 (480 airport-year observations). Scope 1 and 2 emissions and traffic data are combined with Airport Carbon Accreditation records, airport sustainability reports, and Skytrax-based rankings. Three indices are constructed: an Airport Management Index for carbon governance, a Green Logistics Index for cargo-side environmental practices, and a Service Quality Index for passenger-facing performance. Fixed-effects panel models with airport and year fixed effects are estimated for emissions per passenger and per aircraft movement. Over time, in airports, a ten-point increase in the management index is associated with roughly 3 to 4% lower emissions intensity per passenger, while a comparable change in the green logistics index corresponds to 2 to 3% lower emissions intensity. The service quality index shows no systematic association once management and logistics are included. The pattern is stable across alternative index constructions, alternative weights, lagged specifications, exclusion of COVID-19 years, and a falsification test. The findings show a clear dissociation: low-carbon airport performance and high service-quality rankings are largely separate dimensions of airport operations.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-026-00804-6first seen 2026-07-03 05:02:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。