← 論文一覧に戻る

グリーン移行と不平等な負担:ASEANにおけるジェンダー不平等と正義のギャップ

GREEN TRANSITION, UNEQUAL BURDENS: GENDER INEQUALITY AND THE JUSTICE GAP IN ASEAN (原題)

Fidela Dzatadini Wahyudi, Si Yusuf Al Hafiz, Muhamad Irwan, Angger Dimas Bayu Sadewo

SIBATIK JOURNAL Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial Ekonomi Budaya Teknologi dan Pendidikan📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-04#エネルギー転換Origin: Global
DOI: 10.47353/sibatik.v5i7.5214
原典: https://doi.org/10.47353/sibatik.v5i7.5214

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、ASEAN諸国における再生可能エネルギー進展が環境改善やジェンダー平等に必ずしも結びつかないことを、2016〜2023年のデータを用いて実証した。マレーシアは比較的整合的だが、カンボジアやインドネシアなどでは再生可能エネルギー進展にもかかわらずPM2.5改善が見られない。ジェンダー不平等は改善傾向にあるが、その速度は一様でなく、エネルギー転換と正義のギャップを概念化している。

English

This study empirically shows that renewable energy progress in ASEAN does not necessarily translate into environmental improvement or gender equality, using 2016-2023 data. Malaysia shows relatively aligned trajectories, while Cambodia, Indonesia, and others have renewable progress without PM2.5 improvement. Gender inequality improves but unevenly, conceptualizing a green transition-justice gap.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX政策では、エネルギー転換の社会的公正(公正な移行)が注目されており、本研究成果はASEANとの比較や国際協力の視点で参考になる。国内の地域間格差や雇用への影響を考える際の示唆も得られる。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global discussions on just transition, highlighting that renewable energy growth alone does not ensure social justice. It offers a framework for evaluating green transition quality beyond emissions, relevant for policymakers and researchers focusing on equity in climate action.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on the decoupling of energy transition from social justice, useful for just transition research.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need for companies to consider social impacts beyond carbon reduction in sustainability strategies.

🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes that green transition policies must integrate social and gender equity to avoid justice gaps.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The green transition is expected to reduce environmental burdens and widen social justice, yet these gains do not necessarily advance together. This study examines whether renewable-energy progress across ASEAN has been accompanied by comparable improvements in environmental conditions and gender equality. Using a comparative longitudinal design, country-level data from Our World in Data for 2016–2023 were analyzed in Python through Sen’s slope estimation, standardized directional trends, and cross-country trajectory mapping. The results reveal an asynchronous green transition, in which energy, environmental, and gender trajectories move at substantially different speeds. Malaysia demonstrates the most relatively aligned trajectory, whereas Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, and Thailand record renewable-energy progress without comparable improvements in PM2.5 exposure. Gender inequality improves across the observed countries, but its pace varies considerably and does not consistently correspond with either renewable-energy growth or environmental improvement. These findings challenge the assumption that technological progress naturally translates into broader justice outcomes. This study conceptualizes such divergence as the green transition–justice gap: the distance between progress in energy transformation and its translation into environmental and gender-justice outcomes. The findings reposition law and institutions as critical mechanisms for connecting technological change with the distribution of environmental and social benefits. For ASEAN, the quality of green transition should therefore be judged not only by how rapidly energy systems become greener, but by how consistently that progress reduces environmental burdens and advances social justice.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。