炭素回収・貯留技術と気候政策の経済的相互作用：ノルウェーとイタリアの比較分析
Karbon yakalama ve depolama teknolojilerinin iklim politikalarıyla ekonomik etkileşimi: Norveç ve İtalya'nın karşılaştırmalı analizi (原題)
Buse Gizem Demirkan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、ノルウェーとイタリアを事例に、CCS技術の導入・発展を規定する経済的・政治的相互作用を比較分析する。ノルウェーは欧州で最も強固なCCS戦略を持つ一方、イタリアはエネルギー構造上CCSを必要としながらも政策が断片化し、EU依存のプロジェクトに留まり普及の障壁が大きい。異なる政策枠組みとエネルギー構造の下で有効な政策手法を特定し、CCS普及への示唆を与える。
English
This thesis compares Norway and Italy to examine how economic and political factors shape CCS adoption. Norway has one of Europe's strongest CCS strategies, while Italy—despite needing CCS given its energy mix—suffers fragmented policy and EU-dependent projects, hindering diffusion. It identifies policy practices that best enable widespread CCS deployment across differing policy and energy contexts.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はCCSをGX推進の重点技術と位置づけ、北海道・マレーシア等での事業化を進める。ノルウェーの長期政策・国家支援モデルとイタリアの断片化リスクの対比は、日本のCCS政策設計・事業リスク評価に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
CCS is central to EU and global net-zero pathways, with Norway's Longship and EU CCS Directive/Innovation Fund shaping the landscape. This comparative case adds evidence on how policy coherence and incentives determine CCS deployment, relevant to ISSB/transition-plan disclosure of hard-to-abate sectors.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:CCS普及における政策一貫性と経済インセンティブの役割を比較事例で示す研究材料となる。
🏢実務担当者:CCS事業参入を検討する企業は、国家支援制度と政策安定性の差が事業成立性を左右する点を参考にできる。
🏛政策担当者:CCS普及には断片化を避け、長期で一貫した支援・インセンティブ設計が不可欠という政策的示唆を得られる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change is becoming increasingly severe. Consequently, emission reductions are mandatory in line with the limits set by the Paris Agreement. While renewable energy is a crucial tool for reducing emissions and achieving climate change targets, it is not readily available for emissions in sectors that are difficult to reduce and contain a high proportion of emissions. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies stand out as a critical tool for mitigating climate change, particularly in sectors where carbon dioxide reduction is seen as limited, such as heavy industry. This thesis examines the economic and political interactions shaping the adoption and development of CCS technology in Europe through a comparative analysis using the examples of Norway and Italy. While Norway possesses one of the strongest and most sustainable carbon capture strategies in Europe, Italy, despite needing CCS technology due to its energy structure, has a fragmented policy strategy and projects dependent solely on the EU, creating significant obstacles to widespread adoption of CCS technology in Italy. This thesis aims to understand the impact of different policy strategies and economic incentives on the implementation and success of carbon capture and storage technologies. The results of this study aim to contribute to the fight against climate change on a global scale by identifying the most beneficial policy practices for the widespread adoption of CCS technology in countries with different policy frameworks and energy identities, particularly Italy and Norway.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://hdl.handle.net/11511/120994first seen 2026-10-19 04:54:37
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。