gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Discussion on Economic Benefit Analysis and Sustainable Development Path in Low-Carbon City Development

低炭素都市開発における経済的利益分析と持続可能な開発経路に関する議論 (AI 翻訳)

Haoyu Liao

Frontiers in Sustainable Development📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-25#エネルギー転換Origin: Global
DOI: 10.54691/2m4qhe95
原典: https://doi.org/10.54691/2m4qhe95

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、低炭素都市の経済的便益を3つの経路（直接コスト削減・雇用、炭素市場・グリーンファイナンス、主要地域の比較）から分析。IEAやEU-ETSなどのデータとコペンハーゲン、中国、EUの事例を用いて、カーボンプライシングや公正な移行に関する政策提言を行う。

English

This paper analyzes the economic benefits of low-carbon cities via three pathways: cost savings & jobs, carbon markets & green finance, and comparative trajectories. Using data from IEA, EU-ETS and case studies (Copenhagen, China, EU), it offers policy recommendations on carbon pricing and just transition.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でも自治体レベルでの脱炭素計画が進む中、国際比較事例から得られる示唆は有効。特に中国の低炭素都市パイロットや欧州の制度と日本の都市戦略との比較に活用できる。

In the global GX context

As cities globally commit to net-zero, this paper provides a structured economic rationale for urban decarbonization, comparing approaches from Copenhagen, China, and the EU. Useful for framing municipal transition strategies under ISSB/TCFD-aligned disclosures.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a consolidated framework for analyzing urban decarbonization economics across multiple jurisdictions.

🏢実務担当者:Offers concrete policy levers (carbon pricing, green finance) for city sustainability teams to advocate for low-carbon investments.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights design elements for carbon pricing and equitable transition that can be adapted to national or local contexts.

📄 Abstract（原文）

The construction of low-carbon cities has emerged as an important strategy to realise the harmonious development of urban economy and climate change mitigation. Cities account for about 70% of global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions. The economics of urban decarbonisation – the costs of transition, the benefits of energy efficiency, green jobs, health co-benefits and carbon market revenues – is therefore of critical policy relevance. In this article, we explore three complimentary ways in which low-carbon city development might bring economic benefits: (i) direct cost savings and employment benefits; (ii) carbon market and green finance methods; and (iii) comparative development trajectories between leading jurisdictions. Using data from the IEA, IRENA, OECD and the EU Emissions Trading System, and case studies from Copenhagen, China’s Low-Carbon City Pilot programme and the European Union, the paper makes the case that the economic case for low-carbon urbanism is solid and is getting stronger if policy frameworks can be crafted to align financial incentives with decarbonisation objectives. The report concludes with policy recommendations regarding the design of carbon pricing, the mobilisation of green funding and the management of an equitable transition.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。