The Role of Economic Policy Instruments in Promoting the Green Building Transition: Evidence from Sydney
グリーンビルディング移行における経済政策手段の役割：シドニーからのエビデンス (AI 翻訳)
Zhexuan Chen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はシドニーを事例に、グリーンビルディング移行を促進する経済政策手段の役割を分析。BASIXのような規制手段は限界がある一方、補助金や炭素価格付け、NABERS評価に基づくグリーンファイナンスが有効であることを示す。政策の統合的活用が重要と結論。
English
This study examines economic policy instruments for green building transition using Sydney as a case. It finds that regulatory tools like BASIX have limited impact, while incentives, carbon pricing, and green finance tied to NABERS ratings are effective. Synergistic policy integration is key for achieving net-zero building targets.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の建築分野のGX（省エネ基準、ZEB、炭素価格導入）と比較可能な知見を提供。特に、規制と経済的インセンティブの組み合わせの重要性は、日本の建築物省エネ法やGXリーグ設計にも示唆。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global GX discourse on building decarbonization by demonstrating how economic instruments complement regulation. Its findings on performance-based green finance (NABERS) offer insights for ISSB-aligned disclosure and transition finance frameworks internationally.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on policy mix effectiveness for building transitions, relevant for scholars studying carbon pricing and green finance in urban contexts.
🏢実務担当者:Insights for corporate real estate and construction firms on leveraging green building grants and NABERS ratings for sustainability and market value.
🏛政策担当者:Actionable policy design lessons on combining regulation, carbon pricing, and green finance to meet net-zero building targets.
📄 Abstract（原文）
In the context of global climate change, transitioning the building industry toward green and low-carbon development has become an inevitable trend. This paper takes Sydney, Australia, as a case study to explore the role of economic policy instruments in facilitating the green building transition.It examines a multidimensional policy framework, inclusive of incentives for green buildings, mechanisms on carbon pricing, green finance and their interactions. The results show that while tools such as BASIX1 can only provide baseline environmental thresholds, regulatory in nature, they remain highly limited in addressing high upfront costs and institutional barriers. By analysing the Green Building Grant in Sydney and Australia's carbon pricing experience, the study demonstrates that economic incentives can effectively internalize positive environmental externalities. Moreover, green finance is anchored in performance-based schemes such as NABERS ratings, offering long-term momentum by linking sustainability to market value. Ultimately, this study argues that the success of green building transitions lies not in isolated policies but in the synergistic integration of regulatory, financial, and economic instruments. The findings offer practical insights for urban policymakers seeking to optimize policy design toward achieving Sydney's 2035 net-zero building emissions target.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2026.bj32346first seen 2026-05-15 17:27:38
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。