Cross-border Low-Carbon Supply Chain Decision-Making Considering Vertical Spillover and Blockchain under CBAM Regulation

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:Provides a game-theoretic model linking CBAM, blockchain, and supply chain coordination, useful for extending low-carbon supply chain research.

🏢実務担当者:Offers strategic insights on centralized decision-making and technology sharing to enhance emission reduction and profitability under CBAM.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the synergistic effects of carbon tax and spillover, informing carbon pricing and supply chain policy design.

Against the background of the global "dual carbon" goal and the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), targeting problems such as missing trust in emission reduction and insufficient technological collaboration in cross-border low-carbon supply chains, this paper incorporates blockchain technology, vertical spillover of emission reduction and consumer low-carbon preference into a unified analytical framework. It constructs a two-echelon cross-border supply chain model consisting of a single supplier and a single manufacturer, builds Stackelberg game models under centralized decision-making and decentralized decision-making respectively, comparatively analyzes the optimal emission reduction levels, pricing strategies and profit distributions under two scenarios with and without vertical spillover, and verifies the conclusions through numerical simulation. The research shows that the EU CBAM carbon tax, vertical spillover of emission reduction and consumer low-carbon preference form a positive synergistic incentive, which significantly lifts the supply chain's emission reduction level and overall profit, and the synergistic effect is more prominent under centralized decision-making. A rising emission reduction cost coefficient will restrain enterprises' investment in emission reduction, and vertical spillover will aggravate this restraining effect. Whether vertical spillover is considered or not, centralized decision-making outperforms decentralized decision-making in both emission reduction efficiency and total supply chain profit; the higher the carbon tax rate and vertical spillover rate, the wider the gap between the two. This paper further puts forward management insights from the aspects of enterprise technology sharing, decision-making mode selection and government policy guidance, so as to provide theoretical reference and decision support for cross-border supply chains to respond to CBAM regulations and realize low-carbon transformation.

• openalex https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2026.bl35957first seen 2026-08-13 05:06:18