gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Carbon Trading Mechanisms and Government Investment Policies Impact Sustainable Economic Growth and a Green Environment

炭素取引メカニズムと政府投資政策が持続可能な経済成長とグリーン環境に与える影響 (AI 翻訳)

Fang Hu, Yubo Li, Thomas Li‐Ping Tang

Sustainable Development📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-01-22#炭素価格Origin: CN
DOI: 10.1002/sd.70688
原典: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70688

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、炭素排出量取引制度と地方政府投資政策が炭素排出量と経済成長に与える影響を、動的確率的一般均衡(DSGE)モデルを用いて分析する。中国の東部先進地域と中西部発展途上地域を比較し、独立した炭素市場では発展途上地域の排出増加が大きいこと、統一市場では地域間格差が拡大することを示す。政府投資競争は経済成長を促進するが、先進地域の排出増加は抑制される。

English

This paper uses a DSGE model to analyze the interplay of carbon trading mechanisms and government investment policies on carbon emissions and economic growth in China. It finds that independent carbon markets lead to higher emission increases in less developed regions, while a unified market widens regional gaps. Competition among regional governments boosts growth but lowers emission increments in developed regions.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

中国の炭素取引政策を地域間格差の観点から分析した研究。日本のGX政策(カーボンプライシング、地域間調整)にも示唆を与えるが、制度設計の違いに留意が必要。

In the global GX context

This study offers empirical evidence on how carbon market design affects regional disparities, relevant for global carbon pricing debates (e.g., EU ETS, CBAM). It highlights the trade-off between economic growth and emission reduction under different market structures.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:DSGEモデルを用いて炭素市場の地域間影響を定量化した分析手法が参考になる。

🏢実務担当者:地域ごとの排出削減インセンティブ設計に関する示唆があるが、直接実務には応用しにくい。

🏛政策担当者:統一炭素市場が地域間格差を拡大する可能性を政策設計で考慮すべき点を示す。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Within the constraints of the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, China must intricately balance between carbon emissions and economic growth. The market regulation mechanisms of the carbon emissions trading scheme and the macro‐control mechanisms of local government investment robustly impact carbon emissions (in kilotons, kt) and intensity of carbon emissions (in metric tons per million GDP, t/million). Economic growth varies greatly across various regions in China. We apply the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model to analyze the dynamics of economic growth in different carbon trading schemes across the developed eastern regions and the underdeveloped central and western regions. We incorporate the levels and the differences in economic growth across regions. Our research reveals the following discoveries: First, when regions have mutually independent carbon trading markets, carbon emissions increase more in underdeveloped regions, with higher local economic growth. Second, with a unified carbon trading mechanism, the gaps in carbon emissions and economic output between developed and underdeveloped regions widen further. Developed regions have higher incremental carbon emissions and lower incentives to reduce emissions. Third, as the competition between regional governments for economic growth and carbon emissions intensifies, each region's economy grows significantly. Interestingly, as governments invest in their economies, incremental carbon emissions in developed regions are substantially lower than in underdeveloped regions. Our economic model reveals a critical reference for explaining the imbalance of regional economic development in the context of China's low‐carbon emissions.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。