Intergenerational Equity in Climate Governance
気候ガバナンスにおける世代間の公平性 (AI 翻訳)
Seung-Hyun Cho
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
この論文は、世代間公平性の原則が国際法から国内気候政策にどのように移行するかを検討する。ストックホルム宣言、UNFCCC、パリ協定に基づく法的基準を導き、EU-CBAM、ドイツの炭素予算、韓国の憲法裁判所判決、カナダの燃料課金停止、カリフォルニア・ケベック排出権取引の5事例を分析。時間的整合性、信頼性、負担移転回避の3指標を用い、国際法では強い統合がみられるが国内実施は脆弱であると結論。政策提言として独立炭素予算委員会や年次セクター別目標などを提示。
English
This paper examines how intergenerational equity moves from treaty language to domestic climate policy. It derives a legal benchmark and tests it against five cases: EU CBAM, Germany's carbon-budget, South Korea's constitutional ruling, Canada's fuel charge pause, and California–Québec cap-and-trade. Using metrics of temporal alignment, credible commitment, and avoidance of burden-shifting, it finds strong integration in international law but uneven domestic embedding. Policy implications include independent carbon-budget committees and annual sector targets.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のカーボンプライシング導入議論やGX推進策に関連。信頼性あるコミットメントや負担移転回避の枠組みは、自主的取り組みに依存する日本政策に示唆を与える。独立した炭素予算委員会などの提言は日本でも参考となる。
In the global GX context
This paper is highly relevant to the global discourse on carbon pricing and climate governance. Its comparative cases—CBAM, carbon budgets, court rulings—offer valuable insights for policymakers seeking to strengthen the credibility and temporal alignment of climate commitments. The analysis of burden-shifting is timely for the ongoing implementation of Paris Agreement long-term strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Researchers studying climate governance, intergenerational equity, or carbon pricing design will find a novel legal benchmark and comparative case analysis.
🏢実務担当者:Practitioners involved in carbon market design or corporate climate strategy can learn from the institutional recommendations on independent committees and comply-or-tighten mechanisms.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers negotiating or implementing carbon border adjustments, carbon budgets, or cap-and-trade systems should note the conditions for credible commitment and avoidance of burden-shifting.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This paper examines how the principle of intergenerational equity moves from treaty language to domestic climate policy. It first derives a legal benchmark from the Stockholm Declaration, the UNFCCC, and the Paris Agreement’s preambular reference to intergenerational equity and Article 4.19 on long-term low-emission strategies. It then tests the benchmark against five cases at the core of contemporary governance, the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), Germany’s post-Neubauer carbon-budget framework, South Korea’s Constitutional Court ruling requiring year-by-year targets, Canada’s 2025 pause of the federal consumer fuel charge, and the linked California–Québec cap-and-trade market. The analysis adopts three metrics, temporal alignment, credible commitment, and avoidance of burden-shifting, and reads official texts, auction outcomes, and court decisions. The findings support the central hypothesis that integration of the intergenerational principle is strong in international law, while domestic embedding remains uneven and fragile, improving where courts or automatic policy levers constrain back-loading. Policy implications include independent carbon-budget committees, annual sector pathways with “comply-or-tighten” triggers, cap-and-trade design that restores scarcity when prices clear at the floor, and CBAM roadmaps that link border pricing to plant-level investment. These institutional choices convert treaty ideals into durable, near-term delivery.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.66245/jyi.v1.i2.009first seen 2026-06-19 05:20:24
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。