Who leads matters: A governance-informed typology for implementing and scaling nature-based solutions
誰が主導するかが重要：自然を基盤としたソリューションの実施とスケーリングのためのガバナンスに基づく類型 (AI 翻訳)
Kirk B. Enu, Christian Albert, Beate Jessel
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、既存のNbS類型が技術的形態や生態系機能に偏り、ガバナンスを二次的に扱っている問題を指摘し、実施リーダーシップに着目したガバナンス類型を提案する。35の都市NbS事例に適用し、5つのアーキタイプ（国家主導、市場主導、共同主導、コミュニティ主導、市民主導）を特定。リーダーシップのタイプは開始時点ではなく構成要素の調整から推測されるべきであり、政策手段の適合性やスケーリング経路に示唆を与える。
English
This paper proposes a governance-informed typology for nature-based solutions (NbS) based on implementation leadership, addressing the gap in existing classifications that prioritize technical form over governance. Analyzing 35 urban NbS cases, it identifies five governance archetypes: state-led, market-led, co-led, community-led, and citizen-led. The typology reveals that seemingly similar interventions differ substantially in governance structure, with implications for policy fit and scaling pathways.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではNbSが国家戦略や自治体の気候適応計画に組み込まれつつあるが、ガバナンス類型の明確化は政策設計や資金配分の効率化に寄与する。本類型は、日本の都市緑化や生態系保全事業の実施主体の実態を比較分析する枠組みとして活用できる。
In the global GX context
Globally, NbS are central to climate adaptation and biodiversity frameworks like the UNFCCC and CBD. This governance typology complements existing classifications by highlighting how leadership structures affect feasibility and scaling, offering a tool for cross-case learning and policy design across heterogeneous urban contexts.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a novel governance typology for NbS that enables comparative analysis of implementation leadership across cases.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a framework to assess governance structures in NbS projects, aiding in stakeholder alignment and scaling strategies.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of leadership type for policy instrument fit, supporting the design of adaptive governance for NbS at scale.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Existing nature-based solutions (NbS) typologies prioritize technical form, ecosystem function or spatial scale and treat governance as secondary, limiting their ability to explain variation in feasibility, coordination, persistence and scaling. We propose a governance-informed typology anchored in implementation leadership-defined as the actor or coalition in which constitutive levers (decision authority, resource control and stewardship responsibility) converge at institutional stabilization. Operationalized through four analytical levers and applied to 35 urban NbS cases, the framework identifies five recurring governance archetypes: state-led, market-led, co-led, community-led and citizen-led. Leadership type is best inferred from the alignment of constitutive levers rather than from initiation. The typology complements existing classifications by demonstrating that seemingly similar interventions diverge substantially in governance structure and enabling conditions, with direct implications for policy instrument fit and plausible scaling pathways. As an analytical lens, it supports comparative learning and anticipates institutional constraints when scaling NbS across heterogeneous urban contexts.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02421-yfirst seen 2026-07-13 06:00:49
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。